Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same BF

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

TeddyBaller
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by TeddyBaller »

brady, nor peyton, nor eli, nor brees, need all-pro backs... any dime a dozen back can get you 900 yards with the spread offense phenomenom in college, you should never take a runningback in the first round in 2015... at least i wouldnt... you can get a thomas rawls later, and power back with vision will succeed with teddy because teams have to put a spy and account for teddy's legs... teddy is a new age qb, but norv is using him like he is troy aikman lol
TeddyBaller
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by TeddyBaller »

MichViking wrote:While I will admit id like to see more Mckinnon.....I don't think Teddy's struggles are because of Peterson. That's just ridiculous. You propose making our team worse, and then hoping that Teddy steps his game up.

teddy won 7 games without ad last year, if we had 7 wins this year we would be bordering on the line of playoffs, plus not to mention our depth with our draft picks that we hit on
User avatar
IIsweet
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 959
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:02 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by IIsweet »

I mentioned something in another post but this one started to steer right into what I said.
I actually went and watched a handful of Teddy B-water highlight films.
The majority of his highlights came from neither the shotgun nor under center, but from the pistol.
I wonder how AD would do in this formation?
It makes sense, AD gets a couple steps going and the ball deep.
Teddy can begin scanning the field. It opens up the draw. It helps the OL. To me, it may be the way to coexist and have BOTH players put up numbers. The other 2 formations benefit 1 but not the other.

On a side note, I can see us playing a shotgun offense as soon as AD is gone.
Thus playing the NE offense like Brady and co.
User avatar
CbusVikesFan
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by CbusVikesFan »

Mothman wrote:Hogwash.
:rofl: Indeed
AP holding TB back? How about TB holding the "Vikings" back?
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Posts: 2992
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by Jordysghost »

TeddyBaller wrote:
teddy won 7 games without ad last year, if we had 7 wins this year we would be bordering on the line of playoffs, plus not to mention our depth with our draft picks that we hit on
So, you won less games last year without AP then you have this year with AP? You don't say.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Posts: 2992
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by Jordysghost »

TeddyBaller wrote:brady, nor peyton, nor eli, nor brees, need all-pro backs... any dime a dozen back can get you 900 yards with the spread offense phenomenom in college, you should never take a runningback in the first round in 2015... at least i wouldnt... you can get a thomas rawls later, and power back with vision will succeed with teddy because teams have to put a spy and account for teddy's legs... teddy is a new age qb, but norv is using him like he is troy aikman lol
They don't need them you are right, but it certainly makes their teams more dangerous to have one.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by Mothman »

TeddyBaller wrote: teddy won 7 games without ad last year, if we had 7 wins this year we would be bordering on the line of playoffs, plus not to mention our depth with our draft picks that we hit on
The Vikings won 7 games last year and Bridgewater didn't play in one of those wins. The Vikes were 6-6 in games he started, 6-7 in games he played.
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
Contact:

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Mothman wrote: The Vikings won 7 games last year and Bridgewater didn't play in one of those wins. The Vikes were 6-6 in games he started, 6-7 in games he played.
Stop arguing with Teddy's mother. She clearly thinks the reason for her son's struggles is the best RB in the game.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by Mothman »

PurpleMustReign wrote:Stop arguing with Teddy's mother. She clearly thinks the reason for her son's struggles is the best RB in the game.
I wasn't arguing (why bother?), just correcting.
TeddyBaller
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by TeddyBaller »

Mothman wrote: I wasn't arguing (why bother?), just correcting.
todd gurley> pedereson

i like my rb's who are good in pass pro
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by jackal »

so much for that theory five touchdowns for teddy today ... 4 pass 1 run
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
TSonn
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2127
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by TSonn »

jackal wrote:so much for that theory five touchdowns for teddy today ... 4 pass 1 run
Well, that's a little misleading since 3 of those scores came after AD got injured and played about 20% of the time.
indianation65
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:52 am

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by indianation65 »

Hence, forum battles ensue...

TB and Peterson can't coexist? What? AP in the backfield is always a threat, and teams game plan for him. To say TBs "1" great game today solidifies the idea that AP needs to "gone" is a real stretch. The "team" played well today, not just TB. AP does his part, and he has for years. The Vikes need him, and legs at 30 can still grind it out and leave defenders chasing him. The fumbles, well, enough said.

I'd be more inclined to hope TB has more high performance games than to assume and hope that Peterson is "off" the field. What a notion...

...wisdom ?
...spirits in the wind and the trees
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
Contact:

Re: Teddy and Adrian Peterson can NOT coexsist in the same B

Post by PurpleMustReign »

All, this idiot was banned. Let's close this thread.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
Locked