If I were talented with photo shop (and had lots of spare time) I'd post a picture of an arm chair with 3/4 of its backing missing and ask if that's what you meant.The Breeze wrote:I don't get why someone who has money is expected to pay a larger fine for a crime/infraction that has a predetermined amount. That's not fair at all.
If the crime was of a financial matter and lawsuits were involved then there is probably some dynamic number up to the judge, but a misdemeanor is a misdemeanor and is standard for everyone. Should an athlete pay 10x times what anyone else does for running a stop sign? just because they have money? and i'm not comparing what he did to running a stop sign, rather the level of conviction he got from the legal system.
Also, no one, except the people involved, would have heard about this case had not AD been such a public figure....if anything his status and money are bringing considerably more impact to his life and revenue. All his sponsors have dropped him. His credibility and image in the realm of his public persona has been tainted...forever for some people. Every single day people are in court for this issue somewhere....and there are many outcomes based on evidence and what kinds of cases they are. Rich people, poor people what have you....they are all people. Isn't that the truth?
I'm not seeing how extracting more and more money from him makes this any more just......or scripting how he should feel and respond to the situation in order for him to be clear in his own conscience.
talk about arm chair quarter backing

Just kidding, Breeze. Good post. I agree.