103.9
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 103.9
And a couple of drops by the Packers D (one that may have gone for 6) that would have derailed Ponder and his fragile mental state.
Fairly decent game by Ponder but the man never, ever looks away from his primary until he is on the run. Drives me bonkers
Fairly decent game by Ponder but the man never, ever looks away from his primary until he is on the run. Drives me bonkers

-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Olympia, Washington
Re: 103.9
I still think he makes incredibly stupid plays. Take the end of the second half. Vikes have one timeout. Ponder gets happy feet and runs for a three yard gain in bounds and the Vikes have to burn their last timeout. Just throw the darn ball away! What an idiot! Three yards for a timeout. Un-freaking-believable.
- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
Re: 103.9
Ponder is a curse just like Herpes. He will always do JUst enough to justify keeping him on the team, once u got him u r stuck with him and in the end he will always cause u pain...
Re: 103.9
MelanieMFunk wrote:What was his combined passer rating at Green Bay before today?
I know they said earlier. I thought it was like 44 or something ridiculous.
It definitely wouldn't have been that low. His lowest rating in a game this season was 53 (last week at Seattle).
After today, his cumulative rating for the season is 78.7
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4494
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Viking Country
Re: 103.9
I believe they said his combined passer rating for his last 2 games a Lambeau was 44.3 or something like that.Mothman wrote:
It definitely wouldn't have been that low. His lowest rating in a game this season was 53 (last week at Seattle).
After today, his cumulative rating for the season is 78.7
“He's like a piece of gristle. He's got a great squirt in the hole"-- Brad Childress.
Re: 103.9
His rating against Washington was 113.1 It was 53 against Seattle. As I said, 53 was his lowest rating for the season so it's impossible that his combined rating for any combination of games this season was 44.3. Maybe that was his rating in the second half last week or something?MelanieMFunk wrote: Thank you. That's what I was looking for.
Re: 103.9
I think the 44.3 is 2011 and 2012 in Lambeau Field.Mothman wrote: His rating against Washington was 113.1 It was 53 against Seattle. As I said, 53 was his lowest rating for the season so it's impossible that his combined rating for any combination of games this season was 44.3. Maybe that was his rating in the second half last week or something?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: 103.9
Are you drunk, Moth? (Wish I drank. Might help!)Mothman wrote: His rating against Washington was 113.1 It was 53 against Seattle. As I said, 53 was his lowest rating for the season so it's impossible that his combined rating for any combination of games this season was 44.3. Maybe that was his rating in the second half last week or something?
I'm talking his combined passer rating AGAINST THE PACKERS, IN GREEN BAY, THE PAST TWO SEASONS, COMING IN TO TODAY.
*breathes*
I'm sorry, but I even highlighted it for you and made it bigger.
Are you sure you just don't like to argue? Because dude...come on.


-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: 103.9
An almost interception
Also an almost 2 touchdown catches
and a failed hand off
plus several very good passes. At least during this game it kept the posers off the board waiting to complain about everything, for a while at least. 




Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: 103.9
Yes, I now see that you did, in a response to someone else! Sorry, I don't re-read the entire conversation in each reply and I'm not drunk, I'm working and popping in and out to post so I looked at what purplehaze wrote and what you replied and overlooked your highlighted text. Sorry you didn't have my full attention. However, I do appreciate you being obnoxious about an obvious misunderstanding when you could have just politely pointed out the same information. It's that kind of behavior that's turned this board into a real delight this season.MelanieMFunk wrote:Are you drunk, Moth? (Wish I drank. Might help!)
I'm talking his combined passer rating AGAINST THE PACKERS, IN GREEN BAY, THE PAST TWO SEASONS, COMING IN TO TODAY.
*breathes*
I'm sorry, but I even highlighted it for you and made it bigger.
No, I was actually trying to be helpful by providing what I mistakenly thought was relevant statistical information.Are you sure you just don't like to argue? Because dude...come on.