Re: Vikings vs Dolphins for Wallace?
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:42 am
Tom Pelissero on TwitterMike Wallace's deal ended up being 5 years, $60 million, with $27 million guaranteed -- including a $15 million base salary (!!) in 2014
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
Tom Pelissero on TwitterMike Wallace's deal ended up being 5 years, $60 million, with $27 million guaranteed -- including a $15 million base salary (!!) in 2014
I meant financially. If Tannehill prospers he will command a huge contract. Then the Phins will be in the same place that the Steelers were with Wallace this year and the Ravens with Boldin, Ellerbe etc.GBFavreFan wrote: I think the wisdom or foolishness of this move will fall squarely on the shoulders of Ryan Tannehill. If Ryan improves and proves himself a legit franchise QB, then he will likely do so because Wallace is at his disposal. If he pulls a Ponder and just sort of hits a wall, then Wallace's numbers won't look good and people will call him a bust and try other receivers as if they are the problem.
But one legitimate reason to question Wallace is that he became a stud because Roethlisberger was his QB. Ben has a history of making his receivers shine.