WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Demi »

In fact, Wallace never got into off-field trouble, was one of the hardest workers on the team and last year sacrificed his game, which is the deep ball, to fit into Bill Lazor’s quick-hitting offense.
Going to be interesting to see how he does in an offense he's perfect for. That lets him go out there and do what he does best. Could be a big year for him as long as Teddy stays healthy.
mansquatch
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3836
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Coon Rapids, MN

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by mansquatch »

This is interesting. They've lacked a true downfield threat, the hope was that CP84 would be that guy. Now we have a proven commodity in that role. Reps at WR are going to hard to come by on this team next year unless they start running more 3 and 4 WR sets.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
Boon
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:28 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Boon »

Mothman wrote: I wonder if this move might sway Peterson a little...
I said this in the other thread too. I think you hit the nail on the head, scripted by spielman. If it works he's a genius. WITH adrian this season would be very interesting. Especially if they take waynes at 11 and he turns out to be good as advertised.
nightowl
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2477
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:57 pm
Location: Melbourne,Fl

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by nightowl »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: #1 Johnson??? :confused:
I still maintain you don't need the "#1" WR to win, it's great to have if you can get it.. but not a deal breaker if you don't. Having a well rounded WR corps that can offer a bit of everything can be just as nice. I think the addition of Wallace could be the final piece of that equation. Of course that is putting a certain amount of faith in Charles Johnson's expected further development, amongst many other things. I imagine we'll be seeing Johnson and Wallace outside with Jennings in the slot quite a bit. With the guys they have now they could throw out some interesting 4-5 WR packages. Imagine Patterson as the guy your Dime CB or Safety has to cover?Could be alot of fun. :v):
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Wonder if they will have Wallace KR or PR. CP's whole game just seemed to be off last year, focus on route running this season. Wallace, CP, and Johnson on the field is a lot of speed. For either a hand off to AD or a 5 yrd pass to Kyle or Ford. I bet we go after Sheref (sp?) the T/G first, put him next to Kalil, and its all D from there on out.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by jackal »

Sometimes guys need a fresh start ...Miami has had a ton of problems
and one of the worst player development programs IMO ...Zimmer and Norv have
dealt with many tough situations .... I will hope for the best for Wallace and the Vikings.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
nfcnorthchamps25
Backup
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:12 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by nfcnorthchamps25 »

Think this means we will ha e 6 wrs on our roster next year. Doesn't make sense to get rid of Jennings cause he's a solid number two or three. Both Patterson and thielen are valuable on special teams and should be kept.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by jackal »

Sometimes guys need a fresh start ...Miami has had a ton of problems
and one of the worst player development programs IMO ...Zimmer and Norv have
dealt with many tough situations .... I will hope for the best for Wallace and the Vikings.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Purple bruise »

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Puddin'Taine
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 975
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:55 pm
Location: I'm Not Sure, But it's dark and I hear Laughing!!

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Puddin'Taine »

Boon wrote: I said this in the other thread too. I think you hit the nail on the head, scripted by spielman. If it works he's a genius. WITH adrian this season would be very interesting. Especially if they take waynes at 11 and he turns out to be good as advertised.

I'm pretty sure AP is swayed already, I really have a hard time believing he is going anywhere at this point. Pretty sure that happened earlier this week.

But fact of the matter is, however unexpected and unimaginable this was to me as Wallace wasn't even close to on my radar this year. This is AWESOME! :rock:
"He kept getting pies in the face and everyone thought it was so funny.I didn't think it was so funny.They should have eaten the pies instead of throwing them at each other If they were mad,why didn't they just knock the crap out of each other?"
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Purple bruise »

Puddin'Taine wrote:
I'm pretty sure AP is swayed already, I really have a hard time believing he is going anywhere at this point. Pretty sure that happened earlier this week.

But fact of the matter is, however unexpected and unimaginable this was to me as Wallace wasn't even close to on my radar this year. This is AWESOME! :rock:
I agree and Wallace does have all the "tools" to become a very good #1 receiver.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by The Breeze »

I'm reeaally enjoying the optimism being expressed and the possibitly of a fully equipped offense too.

I hope Wallace embraces the opportunity and something clicks for this team....it's been tough watching them struggle the last few seasons.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by jackal »

With Wallace that gives five or six guys with (or very close) 4.3 speed

Peterson, Wallace, Wright, Patterson, McKinnon, (Johnson ??? not sure about)

I can't think of very many faster offenses, if any

Teddy will be better next season as well.. Our defense should be better too
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by mosscarter »

i am not a fan of this trade, but i might become one if teddy can hit him on some deep balls this season. i think brandon marshall is a way more complete receiver and we would have gotten him for about the same we gave up in this deal. i live in the pittsburgh area and all of my friends were happy (along with most of the town) to see wallace leave when he did. one of the complaints people often made about him were that he was very one dimensional. one thing is for sure; he is way overpaid.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings

Post by Mothman »

nightowl wrote: I still maintain you don't need the "#1" WR to win, it's great to have if you can get it.. but not a deal breaker if you don't. Having a well rounded WR corps that can offer a bit of everything can be just as nice. I think the addition of Wallace could be the final piece of that equation. Of course that is putting a certain amount of faith in Charles Johnson's expected further development, amongst many other things. I imagine we'll be seeing Johnson and Wallace outside with Jennings in the slot quite a bit. With the guys they have now they could throw out some interesting 4-5 WR packages. Imagine Patterson as the guy your Dime CB or Safety has to cover?Could be alot of fun. :v):
Agreed. I've always thought "#1 WR" was basically a synonym for "star WR". If you can get one, it's great but beyond that, it's not really an actual position to be filled. Having talent that fits the system and works well together matters a lot more.
Post Reply