Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Mothman »

80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Most commenters on sports articles and videos are either trolls or idiots, or both.
Agreed but the quote I posted was in the article, not in the comments on the article.
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Funkytown »

Just Me wrote: It is an interesting point. But...the sample size is incredibly small (1 game). FWIW I think that IS significant, but I can also conclude that every game I attended in person (Bears @ Vikings) this year resulted in a Viking win so to give us the best chance at home, I need to be there. Anyone for sending me their season tickets? (It's for the good of the team!) :D
I was at the game, too--Row 4 over by CheeseFree and Diggz! :thumbsup: Actually, I attended 4 games last year--all wins. And I had season tickets for the '09 season and--we obviously won them all. And my overall record is 16-5. I think that's pretty solid. I'm the good luck charm! :D Well, along with Favre probably. lol. Ooooh, PLUS...I attended the last two draft parties and look at how those turned out. Juuuust sayin'. :wink:
Image
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Mothman »

80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Oh, you threw me off when you said comments.

I see how that might have been misleading. Sorry about that...
Exactly. It was posted by one of Yahoo's sports bloggers but in a post about the Vikes stadium, it's just a completely unnecessary shot. As I said, hopefully Ponder will get the last laugh. That would be good for all of us!
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Purple bruise »

This is an interesting point of view: http://www.dailynorseman.com/2013/5/9/4 ... -last-year


Fanposts:
TVS: Ponder as Important As Peterson last year? "By now, if you're an addicted Vikings fan, like myself, you have heard the reports of Rick Speilman stating to NFL Network that Christian Ponder was as important to the Minnesota Vikings run to the playoffs last year, as the MVP, Adrian Peterson. This report has inspired me to create a new article in the Vikings Scoop's In-Depth Series. (READ ON)
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
King James
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by King James »

MelanieMFunk wrote: I was at the game, too--Row 4 over by CheeseFree and Diggz! :thumbsup: Actually, I attended 4 games last year--all wins. And I had season tickets for the '09 season and--we obviously won them all. And my overall record is 16-5. I think that's pretty solid. I'm the good luck charm! :D Well, along with Favre probably. lol. Ooooh, PLUS...I attended the last two draft parties and look at how those turned out. Juuuust sayin'. :wink:
If that's the case you should have went to the NFC Champion game, maybe we would've won!!! :wallbang:
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by jackal »

I thought ponder played his best games against SF and the Texans and the second GB game
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by mondry »

jackal wrote:I thought ponder played his best games against SF and the Texans and the second GB game
Those were definitely good ones! I really liked the SF game, he did a lot to help us in that one, including that sick TD scramble.
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Funkytown »

If that's the case you should have went to the NFC Champion game, maybe we would've won!!! :wallbang:
Oh trust me: If it was in Minnesota, I would have been there. I wish it would have happened that way, but no such luck. Check out my quote about the football God hating Vikings fans. It's a true story. :x As much as it sucked, I suppose it just wasn't meant to be. It still cuts pretty deeply, though--and I think it always will! Having season tickets that year (and moving up to Minnesota just for that purpose) made it extremely personal for me. Blah. Let's not talk about it! ;)

We'll get there someday! Hopefully Ponder and the boys figure it out for us!

:govikes:
Image
bigskyeric
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1350
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Dull-youth, Minn-E-so-taw

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by bigskyeric »

I'd like to see important stats on every player in the wins vs. losses. My bet is that most everyone played a little worse in the losses.
Seek and Destroy
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Funkytown »

Boon wrote: It was in new orleans :(
Yeah. And in New Orleans...that happened. :steamed:

That game makes me sick. And I have a pretty good friend (good, reliable source) who is friends with someone who is related to an NFL official. He told him that Goodell told the officials to "go a little harder on the Vikings" for that game because he was still upset about the Williams' brothers case. Not sure how much truth there is to it, but the person that told me is very reliable. They wouldn't be passing on this info if they didn't truly believe it themselves--and believe their source. Either way, we have no one to blame but ourselves--oh, and the football God who hates us, and those darn crooked, half-blind officials. :D
Image
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by jackal »

I was so mad in that game i had to turn it off.. they were hitting Farve late and twisting him like
a pretzel on every tackle... The refs just let it go on .. I have no doubt we got screwed on calls in that
game..
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Funkytown »

Boon wrote: Yeah, I was sick to my stomach after that game. It's no coincidence that the rule changes/pereiras retirement came after that game. Complete BS. Then again, they probably don't go into OT if farve isn't a bonehead, hence giving the refs more chances for bogus PI calls

Yep. I cried. *cough* ....what? :lol:

But seriously, yes, that OT just made it THAT much more obvious of what kind of screw-job we were getting. Wow. No more talking about it! I'm getting mad! LOL.
Image
King James
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by King James »

No one is to blame for that NFC Championship game but the Vikings. Peterson fumbling, Percy Fumbling, Favre making boneheaded mistakes, and dont even get me started on Childress with the "12 men in the huddle." If we were playing like we were suppose to then the game wouldn't have been decided by the refs. We had a chance to be up by atleast 2 TDs. We also had a chance to CLOSE the game in the 4th. But its hard to win when your turnover the ball all those times. Even though the refs were pretty awful, i feel like we still had a chance to win despite all of this blown calls.
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Funkytown »

JEC334 wrote:No one is to blame for that NFC Championship game but the Vikings. Peterson fumbling, Percy Fumbling, Favre making boneheaded mistakes, and dont even get me started on Childress with the "12 men in the huddle." If we were playing like we were suppose to then the game wouldn't have been decided by the refs. We had a chance to be up by atleast 2 TDs. We also had a chance to CLOSE the game in the 4th. But its hard to win when your turnover the ball all those times. Even though the refs were pretty awful, i feel like we still had a chance to win despite all of this blown calls.
Yeah. I suppose what made that game so hard is the fact that we were still in it...and we very well could have won it...we should have won it, despite all of the things you just mentioned. That's what really makes it hurt. If it was out of reach or something, I'd be over it. The close ones always sting a lot more for me. A LOT.
Image
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Comparing Ponder's wins vs. losses in 2012

Post by Mothman »

MelanieMFunk wrote: Yeah. I suppose what made that game so hard is the fact that we were still in it...and we very well could have won it...we should have won it, despite all of the things you just mentioned. That's what really makes it hurt. If it was out of reach or something, I'd be over it. The close ones always sting a lot more for me. A LOT.

Of all the Super Bowl, playoff and championship losses I've watched the Vikes suffer over the years, that one stings the least. I couldn't stand Childress, never wanted Favre and didn't believe that season that those two could ever lead the Vikes to a Super Bowl, much less a Super Bowl win. I'm really glad they're both gone. The Vikes are a lot more fun to cheer for now.
Post Reply