I'll go with option #2.acousticrock wrote:Here's the deal everyone:
Despite a couple bad throws by Ponder (which is about the average of every quarterback in the NFL), Ponder put us in position to be competitive in this game against the Bears. Unfortunately, our other players weren't able to do some pretty basic requirements of their jobs.
1st Quarter:
Peterson fumbles at the 32 yard line. Chicago gets a TD within 6 plays. (Bears -7)
- You can blame Peterson for fumbling or the defense for allowing the Bears to convert on a 3rd and 6 and then get a TD.
2nd Quarter:
Vikings drive 50 yards into the redzone. On a 3rd and 6 play, Ponder lofts a perfectly placed ball in the endzone for Rudolph to grab. Rudolph gets two hands on the ball but isn't able to hold on. (Vikings +7)
- Looked like a decent play by the Chicago DB by hitting Rudolph's arm right after Rudolph grabbed the ball, but Rudolph still has to come down with that since he had two hands on it!
4th Quarter:
Vikings have some momentum and are in the midst of a 70 yard drive. On 3rd and 2 (when the coaches should have called AD's number) Ponder scrambles left and floats a ball to Wright in the corner of the endzone. The ball hits both hands, but Wright drops it. (Vikings +7)
- There's some pressure on Wright in the corner with two DBs running at him, but neither hit him hard and he should have come down with the ball since it he hand two hands on it.
- Ponder rushes the following 4th down play, but really, we should have already had the TD on the 3rd down play if Wright makes an average catch in the endzone.
Had these plays been made (or not made in AD's case), they wouldn't have been spectacular highlights - they would have been pretty mundane and average plays. AD doesn't fumble but gains 2 yards. Rudolph out-jumps all the Chicago DBs and comes down with a TD. Wright catches a TD in the back corner of the endzone. Fairly mediocre plays to expect out of professional football players at our skilled positions.
Sure, Ponder made some mistakes, too. He threw an INT that led to a Bears touchdown, he missed an open receiver on the 4th down play, and he took a couple sacks. But even including his mistakes (and excluding the other 7-8 drops by Vikings WRs) - the three aforementioned plays would have made the game Vikings 10 (+7+7) = 24 and Bears 28 (-7) = 21 (Vikings 24, Bears 21). Now, I'm not sure how exactly the game would have played out, but it would have been nice to watch that version of the game play out where our skilled players make non-spectacular plays led by Ponder.
We could expect Ponder to play a perfect game against a divisional opponent on the road, but really, what's a more reasonable/realistic expectation...
Our second-year QB to not throw an INT against the Bears defense?
OR
Our WRs to catch the ball if they get two hands on it and our stud RB to not fumble twice in Bears territory?
Great post!