Vikings Message Board.Com

radar55 wrote: We all have seen a whole lot worse than that not get called but just remember this latter in the game when a similar call goes against us. This board will light up with the REFS ARE OUT TO GET US AGAIN chants that seem to forget the ones that go our way.

That's mainly what I'm concerned about. Vikes had such a crap day with the refs in Baltimore and while two wrongs don't make a right, I'd much rather see PI called when it's blatant interference rather than "interpretive" interference, which I consider that last call to have been.

200+ 1st half yds and a TD for Cassell. There's no way Ponder's brain can function that well.

me4get wrote: Line judge was blocked from seeing the PI, back judge had a cleare view.

Wasn't the line judge, he always stays on the line and doesn't normally make PI calls. Not sure what judge it was, but wasn't the line judge. Just being technical.

headless_norseman wrote:200+ 1st half yds and a TD for Cassell. There's no way Ponder's brain can function that well.

All hyperbole aside, those are stats for a full game by Ponder most of the time. Cassel has played a great half so far.

At least we are holding them to field goals

17-9 Vikings at the half. Nice job.

Jeffbleedspurple wrote:In that play where sherels tried to swat at the ball out of bounds, if he was successful and his feet never touched the ground, if he hit it back in to the field of play is that still a live ball?

Yes.

Chrisitan Ponder in the pocket:




Cassel in the pocket:

me4get wrote: Yes.

Yes, since you are not out of bounds until some part of your body touches out of bounds.

yezzir wrote:Chrisitan Ponder in the pocket:




Cassel in the pocket:

808vikingsfan wrote:
Didn't he reach 200 by halftime last week too?

Maybe not. I must have been dreaming.

No. He had 265 for the whole game and about 114 at the half. Still looked way better than Ponder though.

Pepper in the house!

Purple Reign wrote: Wasn't the line judge, he always stays on the line and doesn't normally make PI calls. Not sure what judge it was, but wasn't the line judge. Just being technical.

a clear view of what.
to me if you're going to call PI in the end zone it should be obvious for a guy that far from the play....it didn't look obvious to me even after 2 replays

but whateva...it's hard to call many times.

The Breeze wrote:

a clear view of what.
to me if you're going to call PI in the end zone it should be obvious for a guy that far from the play....it didn't look obvious to me even after 2 replays

but whateva...it's hard to call many times.

He grabbed his shirt and pulled on it while the ball was in the air... what more do you want?

yezzir wrote:Chrisitan Ponder in the pocket:




Cassel in the pocket: