Vikings Message Board.Com

Odlid wrote:There is a reason why he was traded by NE and released by KC...

Agreed.

And there's also a reason Ted has the nickname GUMP, and soon to be TDT2MBW... 5TD 0INT
#HOPE

START TEDDY!!!!!!!!!


I've been saying this forever, CASSEL IS TERRIBLE! How anyone thought that mediocre loser would be able to be effective for us is beyond me, put in the FRANCHISE. CASSEL. SUCKS. BADLY.

28BreaksAnkles wrote: And there's also a reason Ted has the nickname GUMP...

Great Unless Misemployed Prematurely?

HAHA !
Epic

But ok... Just TDT2MBW then..

Odlid wrote:There is a reason why he was traded by NE and released by KC...

He was traded by NE because he was too good for them to spend the amount of money he demanded to be a backup. How soon after his pro bowl year in KC was he traded?

Severely disappointed. That was beyond horrible. Absolutely inexcusable. I didn't even think it was possible for him to play this bad with all those weapons, but it was nothing short of putrid. I wanted to punch myself in the face at least a half dozen times due to frustration today. I was especially disappointed in Zim for not going to Teddy late in a blowout. There was no reason not to get the rookie some valuable experience when the game was all but over. There was nothing to gain by keeping Cassel in there to throw his 4th pick in the final 12 minutes. Teddy on the other hand could've gained a lot with the experience. I think Cassel should still start next week, but there's no reason why Teddy couldn't have mopped up the huge mess Cassel made. Maybe he could have worked some magic and helped us finish on a high note in an otherwise very forgettable game.

PurpleKoolaid wrote: He was traded by NE because he was too good for them to spend the amount of money he demanded to be a backup. How soon after his pro bowl year in KC was he traded?

2 years after IIRC

Just Me wrote: 2 years after IIRC

Shhh I was trying to make a point lol

PurpleKoolaid wrote: Shhh I was trying to make a point lol

lol - Evidentally I didn't catch it was a rhetorical question...