2025 Schedule

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9803
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

2025 Schedule

Post by Cliff »

Wk Opponent Location
1 @ Bears (MNF) Chicago, IL
2 *Falcons (SNF) Minneapolis, MN
3 Bengals Minneapolis, MN
4 @ Steelers Dublin, IE
5 @ Browns London, UK
6 BYE BYE
7 Eagles Minneapolis, MN
8 @ Chargers Los Angeles, CA
9 @ Lions Detroit, MI
10 Ravens Minneapolis, MN
11 Bears Minneapolis, MN
12 @ Packers Green Bay, WI
13 @ Seahawks Seattle, WA
14 Commanders Minneapolis, MN
15 @ Cowboys (SNF) Dallas, TX
16 @ Giants New York, NY
17 Lions (Xmas) Minneapolis, MN
18 Packers Minneapolis, MN
VikingsFan12345
Practice Squad
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:15 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by VikingsFan12345 »

I am glad Vikings are getting a bye before Vikings play the Eagles
makila
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:43 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by makila »

Interesting the Falcons are at Min again. Back to back seasons.
Image
vikeinmontana
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:23 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by vikeinmontana »

Pretty crazy schedule tv-wise. Monday night to open the season. Two Sunday night games. Back to back games overseas televised early morning. And a Christmas contest. :shock:
i'm ready for a beer.
VikingsFan12345
Practice Squad
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:15 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by VikingsFan12345 »

vikeinmontana wrote: Thu May 15, 2025 9:20 am Pretty crazy schedule tv-wise. Monday night to open the season. Two Sunday night games. Back to back games overseas televised early morning. And a Christmas contest. :shock:
We cannot complain about that, it is nice to have 6 games on TV for people that does not have NFL league pass
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9803
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by Cliff »

VikingsFan12345 wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 5:24 pm I am glad Vikings are getting a bye before Vikings play the Eagles
I've kind of got mixed feelings about it. Week 6 is a little early for a bye. It'd be nice to have it closer to week 9.
VikingsFan12345
Practice Squad
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:15 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by VikingsFan12345 »

Cliff wrote: Fri May 16, 2025 8:12 am
VikingsFan12345 wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 5:24 pm I am glad Vikings are getting a bye before Vikings play the Eagles
I've kind of got mixed feelings about it. Week 6 is a little early for a bye. It'd be nice to have it closer to week 9.
Yeah I agree, it seems like Vikings always get early byes every year except in 2019 and 2023 so it is pretty annoying
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3991
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by CharVike »

Looks like the 4 game stretch after the bye will tell much about this team.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9803
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by Cliff »

CharVike wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 10:39 am Looks like the 4 game stretch after the bye will tell much about this team.
You never really know. I don't know how many games were supposed to be "prove it" games for them last season but then after they won there was always some reason they actually weren't lol
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3991
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by CharVike »

Cliff wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 4:56 pm
CharVike wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 10:39 am Looks like the 4 game stretch after the bye will tell much about this team.
You never really know. I don't know how many games were supposed to be "prove it" games for them last season but then after they won there was always some reason they actually weren't lol
Our fold was expected all season. We weren't considered that strong going in. You're right and things can change.
cogitator
Veteran
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Denver

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by cogitator »

CharVike wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 10:39 am Looks like the 4 game stretch after the bye will tell much about this team.
I was looking at the schedule and thought that could easily be 4 straight losses. Very tough stretch - Super Bowl winner, Chargers on the upswing under Harbaugh, Lions we know about, Ravens are always solid with Lamar Jackson and the other Harbaugh. I'm thinking the Lions might fall back a bit with 2 new coordinators.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9803
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by Cliff »

CharVike wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 6:54 pm
Cliff wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 4:56 pm

You never really know. I don't know how many games were supposed to be "prove it" games for them last season but then after they won there was always some reason they actually weren't lol
Our fold was expected all season. We weren't considered that strong going in. You're right and things can change.
All the experts predicted them to be last in the division and for Darnold to be terrible all year. Every win proving them wrong came with another excuse for why the Vikings were able to beat the odds. They weren't wrong, the Vikings were just lucky 14 times.

In the end they lost to the Lions which was a better team and the Rams where the coach that taught our coach handed him another lesson.

They definitely weren't winning the super bowl last year, but I'm not sure they "folded" as much as had their worst possible matchups.
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3991
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by CharVike »

Cliff wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 8:07 am
CharVike wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 6:54 pm
Our fold was expected all season. We weren't considered that strong going in. You're right and things can change.
All the experts predicted them to be last in the division and for Darnold to be terrible all year. Every win proving them wrong came with another excuse for why the Vikings were able to beat the odds. They weren't wrong, the Vikings were just lucky 14 times.

In the end they lost to the Lions which was a better team and the Rams where the coach that taught our coach handed him another lesson.

They definitely weren't winning the super bowl last year, but I'm not sure they "folded" as much as had their worst possible matchups.
Folded was wrong. You explained it much better and I agree with what you posted. IMO that young Ram team will get better as they develop which is how you build a team. They fought the Eagles hard in their house.
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8616
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by VikingLord »

Cliff wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 8:07 am In the end they lost to the Lions which was a better team and the Rams where the coach that taught our coach handed him another lesson.

They definitely weren't winning the super bowl last year, but I'm not sure they "folded" as much as had their worst possible matchups.
I know a lot of people said McVay came up with a great game plan to neutralize KOC's offense, but after watching a lot of the tape and listening to the commentary I think it was more a combo of McVay learning from how the Lions successfully attacked the Vikings OL and got into Darnold's head more than some novel gameplan that KOC couldn't anticipate or adjust to. And that is what playoff sports in general are all about - creating situations and matchups that maximize an opponent's weaknesses while minimizing their strengths. In that sense I agree they didn't fold as much as they were just unable to adjust to the tactics that worked against them at that point in the season. If they'd run into those two teams at a different point in the season I'd bet that KOC would have found ways to compensate.

Sometimes it's necessary to take a step or two back to take three or four forward though, and I think that's exactly what the Vikings did this offseason. Maybe they couldn't adjust quickly enough to salvage the playoffs last year, but those two late losses provided the clarity that guided this offseason, and while the personnel moves that were made might have been made even if the team had enjoyed playoff success, I suspect the team would have been tempted to stick with guys like Darnold and Bradbury if it had. As it is, they moved on and, more importantly, resisted the temptation to go down geezer lane at QB and are going with younger guys who have upside potential.

It's a gamble but I like the payout if it hits.
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3991
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: 2025 Schedule

Post by CharVike »

VikingLord wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 4:27 pm
Cliff wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 8:07 am In the end they lost to the Lions which was a better team and the Rams where the coach that taught our coach handed him another lesson.

They definitely weren't winning the super bowl last year, but I'm not sure they "folded" as much as had their worst possible matchups.
I know a lot of people said McVay came up with a great game plan to neutralize KOC's offense, but after watching a lot of the tape and listening to the commentary I think it was more a combo of McVay learning from how the Lions successfully attacked the Vikings OL and got into Darnold's head more than some novel gameplan that KOC couldn't anticipate or adjust to. And that is what playoff sports in general are all about - creating situations and matchups that maximize an opponent's weaknesses while minimizing their strengths. In that sense I agree they didn't fold as much as they were just unable to adjust to the tactics that worked against them at that point in the season. If they'd run into those two teams at a different point in the season I'd bet that KOC would have found ways to compensate.

Sometimes it's necessary to take a step or two back to take three or four forward though, and I think that's exactly what the Vikings did this offseason. Maybe they couldn't adjust quickly enough to salvage the playoffs last year, but those two late losses provided the clarity that guided this offseason, and while the personnel moves that were made might have been made even if the team had enjoyed playoff success, I suspect the team would have been tempted to stick with guys like Darnold and Bradbury if it had. As it is, they moved on and, more importantly, resisted the temptation to go down geezer lane at QB and are going with younger guys who have upside potential.

It's a gamble but I like the payout if it hits.
What happened the 1st game? They hammered us that time also. KOC was out coached both times. That playoff game he gave up. He looked like a loser early.
Post Reply