halfgiz wrote:So now what are we going to do with Heinicke ? IR, go with 3 QB's...thoughts?
Chris Tomasson @christomasson
Looks like Taylor Heinicke heading for reserve non football injury list No urgency on him now after acquiring Sam Bradford
Moderator: Moderators
halfgiz wrote:So now what are we going to do with Heinicke ? IR, go with 3 QB's...thoughts?
Chris Tomasson @christomasson
Looks like Taylor Heinicke heading for reserve non football injury list No urgency on him now after acquiring Sam Bradford
halfgiz wrote:Cardinals released Matt Barkley
I thought he looked pretty decent. You could Just IR Heinicke for the rest of the season. For what he doneMothman wrote:
Interesting. The Vikes might want to take a look at him.
Not to toot my own horn but...Maelstrom88 wrote:I think Foles and especially Bradford would be good options. Bradford worked with Shumur before and was ROTY under him. I wouldn't want to give up anything more than a 3rd for Bradford or a 5th for Foles though.
Aside from having done nothing but throw interceptions in his brief NFL career, it certainly would be awkward playing on the same team as the guy who ended your college career early by separating your shoulder. Namely, our man Anthony Barr.Mothman wrote:
Interesting. The Vikes might want to take a look at him.
Mothman wrote:... a good completion percentage in a performance like that is like putting lipstick on a pig.
Maelstrom88 wrote: Not to toot my own horn but...
Purple Martin wrote: Aside from having done nothing but throw interceptions in his brief NFL career, it certainly would be awkward playing on the same team as the guy who ended your college career early by separating your shoulder. Namely, our man Anthony Barr.
I dunno. I think if they signed a guy with no TDs and 4 INTs I might want Barr to take him out again.Mothman wrote:
If Barkley was signed after a workout, it would give them something to bond over.
Mothman wrote:... a good completion percentage in a performance like that is like putting lipstick on a pig.
I'm not saying sign him. I'm saying work him out. They should do the same with Murray.Texas Vike wrote:Big fat NO THANKS to Barkley.
Texas Vike wrote:
I think you just tooted.
Mothman wrote:... a good completion percentage in a performance like that is like putting lipstick on a pig.
I really doubt Stave will ever be ready.Mothman wrote: I'm not saying sign him. I'm saying work him out. They should do the same with Murray.
The way I see it, the Vikings need to heed this wake up call about managing the QB position. Spielman often talks about how they're always trying to get better. I want to see it. After what's happened in this past week, there's no way Hill should be back next year as the primary backup. They need to prepare for the possibility Bridgewater won't be ready to play by next September which means even if they keep Bradford, they have to be thinking about the rest of their QB depth chart. Has Heinicke shown enough to be the #2 going into training camp 2017? Will they draft a QB, sign a free agent during the offseason or is there a guy out there that might be worth developing now?
I just want to see them become very proactive about this position. By next summer, I'd rather see them in the position the Chiefs were in this year, where they had too many QBs and needed to decide who to cut, rather than the position they ended up in this year, with doorkicker hurt, Bridgewater out, Stave not ready and Hill too old to inspire confidence.