Bridgewater Down

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Boon
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:28 pm

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Boon »

fiestavike wrote: It sounds like Sugarman and Co. did a fantastic job. Thank God it sounds like the life threatening and amputation possibilities have been averted. Can you tell us more about the nerve aspect, I've read conflicting reports, and there seems to be some indication that we really can't know about the nerve damage at this point. Do you think its still a real possibility that Teddy might never recover or even walk normally again? I read somewhere that this is not an uncommon outcome with this injury.

Conflicting reports from who? Sugarman said it himself he expects a full recovery and there wasn't any nerve damage. He might be the team physician but he's still a well respected doctor who has a rather extensive history of dealing with these injuries. I think his word on this is pretty solid
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Raptorman »

On another note. Vikings Super Bowl odds went from 18-1 August 27 to 30-1 today.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

S197 wrote: Different injuries, Childs tore both patellar tendons.
Childs tore both patellar tendons at the same time. That's even more of a freaky injury than Teddys
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by jackal »

I have zero interest in this season.
The Vikings and NFL are trying to
compare us to the Rams with Warner.

Complete nonsense..Warner had a arm
and was undiscovered, not a career backup
who every team had given up on.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
allday1991
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:31 pm

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by allday1991 »

jackal wrote:I have zero interest in this season.
The Vikings and NFL are trying to
compare us to the Rams with Warner.

Complete nonsense..Warner had a arm
and was undiscovered, not a career backup
who every team had given up on.
I hear you man, I'm in the same boat. I keep seeing articles saying Vikings aren't as doomed as they think they are and that Bridgewater didn't really have a good year last year and we still almost won a playoff game. Shawn Hill isn't the answer and is no Kurt Warner if he is our starter for the season I'm just not excited or hopeful at all.
“I remember my mistakes more than my success.” - Adrian Peterson
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Mothman »

allday1991 wrote: I hear you man, I'm in the same boat. I keep seeing articles saying Vikings aren't as doomed as they think they are and that Bridgewater didn't really have a good year last year and we still almost won a playoff game. Shawn Hill isn't the answer and is no Kurt Warner if he is our starter for the season I'm just not excited or hopeful at all.
I guess this is a case where some of my skepticism about Bridgewater is paying off because I don't feel like his loss ends their season. I didn't have Super Bowl expectations (slim hopes, maybe, but not expectations) and I figured this would be another year where the team leaned heavily on the running game and the defense. I still think that's what they'll do and I'm still hoping for improvement from the passing game.

This season is far from lost and by the time it's over, I suspect we will have seen much worse from the Vikings in seasons past. I'm still looking forward to seeing what happens.
Gordon Shumway
Practice Squad
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 6:17 pm

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Gordon Shumway »

Mothman wrote: I guess this is a case where some of my skepticism about Bridgewater is paying off because I don't feel like his loss ends their season. I didn't have Super Bowl expectations (slim hopes, maybe, but not expectations) and I figured this would be another year where the team leaned heavily on the running game and the defense. I still think that's what they'll do and I'm still hoping for improvement from the passing game.

This season is far from lost and by the time it's over, I suspect we will have seen much worse from the Vikings in seasons past. I'm still looking forward to seeing what happens.
It's disheartening to see so many fans seemingly give up on the team so easily. Though I have more confidence in Teddy's abilities than your skepticism allows you, I still believe losing him is far from the end for this team. Passing offense was ranked towards the bottom last season with Teddy under center and the team won 11 games and the division. I believe this defense is among the top units in the league and Peterson is still the best RB until proven otherwise. There may be games this season that they lose that perhaps they could have won with Teddy but I still have high hopes for the 2016 Vikings.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by DK Sweets »

HardcoreVikesFan wrote: I should point out it could involve tibiofemoral joint too. I failed to mention that.

If it truly is a proximal tib-fib dislocation, could it be? Yes, if there was damage to the neuro-vascular supply about the fibular head. It is a rare injury.

I don't want to alarm anyone, because we don't know if that was truly what it was. It could be tibiofemoral or involve the patella.

I hope we find out soon. Like Zimmer said, it is really wrong of me to be poking into this. I am just going to have to leave Teddy be and keep him in my thoughts.

It is just a sad situation that I hate to see happen to anyone.
A couple of things:

1a) At the time that I am reading this, I am on page 5/11 on the tapatalk iPhone 6+ app. I'm way behind. Sorry for necro bumping a conversation before I even finish the (#### this thread) very ominous thread.*

1b) I don't know if I have ever EXPLICITLY said this, but I think you are the single most valuable member of this board because you are the most expert in your field. A lot of us know a lot about a lot of things, but none of us know more about a single subject than you know about sports medicine (in my humble opinion). That probably doesn't makes sense, but dammit, I tried.

*For those who somewhat knew me when I was active, I apologize for my inactiveness lately. I've been completely swamped with life lately.

Do not tell me that apologizing for being inactive on a message board is silly. Those of you who truly care about me are the ones who I am apologizing to, because you were the first Vikings family that a Missouri boy ever had. Purple runs deep. SKOL.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Bridgewater Down

Post by DK Sweets »

S197 wrote: While not outrageous, there's a time and a place for everything and this is one of those "can't win" instances for you being that you are an opposing fan. There's a lot of posting with emotion right now, I think once the initial shock wears off people will be more inclined to discuss. Right now though, you're probably better off just taking a step back and letting people vent for a while.
I'm still a few pages back, but I feel like this post really hit the nail on the head. Jordy is a great member of this board, but as he continues to grow with this board, it would be wise for him to occasionally obstain from certain threads.

He could literally be 100% right, but if he wants to be the good neighbor that he seems to usually be, he needs to avoid discussions of ACL tears and Randy Moss bottoms.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Mothman »

DK Sweets wrote: A couple of things:

1a) At the time that I am reading this, I am on page 5/11 on the tapatalk iPhone 6+ app. I'm way behind. Sorry for necro bumping a conversation before I even finish the (#### this thread) very ominous thread.*

1b) I don't know if I have ever EXPLICITLY said this, but I think you are the single most valuable member of this board because you are the most expert in your field. A lot of us know a lot about a lot of things, but none of us know more about a single subject than you know about sports medicine (in my humble opinion). That probably doesn't makes sense, but dammit, I tried.

*For those who somewhat knew me when I was active, I apologize for my inactiveness lately. I've been completely swamped with life lately.

Do not tell me that apologizing for being inactive on a message board is silly. Those of you who truly care about me are the ones who I am apologizing to, because you were the first Vikings family that a Missouri boy ever had. Purple runs deep. SKOL.
I totally understand being "swamped with life", DK. I've been dealing with a similar dynamic this summer.

Know that your contributions are missed when you're away and appreciated when you have time to check in!
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Mothman »

DK Sweets wrote:I'm still a few pages back, but I feel like this post really hit the nail on the head. Jordy is a great member of this board, but as he continues to grow with this board, it would be wise for him to occasionally obstain from certain threads.

He could literally be 100% right, but if he wants to be the good neighbor that he seems to usually be, he needs to avoid discussions of ACL tears and Randy Moss bottoms.
I have one thing to add to this: I agree 100% with Landon (S197) that Wednesday, when the news broke, emotions were running high here and the timing was wrong for Jordy to post some of the comments he posted. They just weren't going to be received well by many Vikings fans. They weren't ready to hear them, particularly from a Packers fan.

That said, he was met with some hostility that crossed the line. He's a fan of a rival team but that doesn't literally make him an enemy and it's not license to break the rules when addressing him. He's just an NFL football fan who likes a different team and we're talking about sports here. As a community, let's keep that in perspective and try to be good hosts as well as loyal Vikings fans.
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by fiestavike »

Boon wrote:

Conflicting reports from who? Sugarman said it himself he expects a full recovery and there wasn't any nerve damage. He might be the team physician but he's still a well respected doctor who has a rather extensive history of dealing with these injuries. I think his word on this is pretty solid
Not about Teddy's injury specifically, but about this type of injury. The question seems to be, is it even possible for Sugarman and doctors to determine that there isn't nerve damage at this point, because, evidently, that is something that is typically revealed later in the process.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9803
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Cliff »

Re: "It won't take much to reproduce Teddy's production". I don't think anybody here wanted Teddy to reproduce that production. We were hoping for a significant step forward and thought we saw it in preseason. Had he continued playing like that, the production would have come and been significantly better than last season. Obviously Teddy's production last year wasn't good enough as the Vikings didn't get to the SB so aiming to reproduce that doesn't make sense to me.

Anyway, we won't know how good or bad he might have been but it was his potential, not actual production from last year, that people don't think we can 'win it all' without. No player available is going to be able to fill Teddy's shoes in the mind of many Vikings fans, especially when those shoes are partially theoretical.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by dead_poet »

Cliff wrote:Re: "It won't take much to reproduce Teddy's production". I don't think anybody here wanted Teddy to reproduce that production. We were hoping for a significant step forward and thought we saw it in preseason. Had he continued playing like that, the production would have come and been significantly better than last season. Obviously Teddy's production last year wasn't good enough as the Vikings didn't get to the SB so aiming to reproduce that doesn't make sense to me.

Anyway, we won't know how good or bad he might have been but it was his potential, not actual production from last year, that people don't think we can 'win it all' without. No player available is going to be able to fill Teddy's shoes in the mind of many Vikings fans, especially when those shoes are partially theoretical.
Thank you
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Bridgewater Down

Post by Mothman »

Cliff wrote:Re: "It won't take much to reproduce Teddy's production". I don't think anybody here wanted Teddy to reproduce that production. We were hoping for a significant step forward and thought we saw it in preseason. Had he continued playing like that, the production would have come and been significantly better than last season. Obviously Teddy's production last year wasn't good enough as the Vikings didn't get to the SB so aiming to reproduce that doesn't make sense to me.

Anyway, we won't know how good or bad he might have been but it was his potential, not actual production from last year, that people don't think we can 'win it all' without. No player available is going to be able to fill Teddy's shoes in the mind of many Vikings fans, especially when those shoes are partially theoretical.
Well said, Cliff. It's the hope people were placing in Bridgewater that is difficult to replace.

As for production, as you indicated, it needs to be better and that's true regardless of who is playing QB. That's still not impossible, although it definitely looks more difficult.
Post Reply