I hear you, especially when he says this all about doing the right thing. It looks more and more to like it's about Kluwe extracting his "pound of flesh from the Vikings for personal reasons.Just Me wrote:I read the Executive Summary of the report. It confirmed only the "nuke the gays" statement (1 time) and found there was no evidence of a pervasive atmosphere of homophobia (my paraphrase). It actually is pretty thorough in how it addressed Kluwe's allegations that his punting had not declined. The summary did not agree with Kluwe's assessment that he was released for other than football reasons. I would think Kluwe will have a tough road here if he proceeds with that part of his lawsuit.
This article seems to contradict Halunen's assertion that both sides agreed to release the "whole report". (Emphasis added was mine)
Two observations:
1) "sources close to the investigation" are always a little suspect; but
2) The executive summary seems to be (again) the agreed upon disclosure.
So, depending on the credibility you want to give to "sources close to the investigation, " it might suggest Kluwe's camp is changing the rules as we go along.
I will say that Kluwe's tweets about the alleged underage girl are a little disconcerting. I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt (that works for him and Priefer, equally) on why him not reporting the issue on the inappropriate comments by Priefer makes sense with him not wanting to be "blackballed," but I'm curious on his justification for waiting until now to report the alleged "compromising situation with an underage[d] girl."
Thank you for the link you provided above. If that e-mail from Halunen is genuine, it certainly undermines the "song" he and Kluwe are singing now.