Ed Reed

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Oakdale63
Backup
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:09 pm

Ed Reed

Post by Oakdale63 »

Bash me for not including this in a separate thread but I think the Vikings should sign Ed on an incentive base.. $1.5-2 million contract. He would provide a great compliment to Harrison's game and equally be a great value coach and mentor. Forgive me if this has been mentioned in the thread, but I don't care to look through each page to see if it has been.
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Funkytown »

I love me some Ed Reed. Don't see it happening, though.
Image
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Purple bruise »

GBFavreFan wrote:I think Rick Spielman's MO is pretty clear, there will be no player older than like Adrian or Greg Jennings. If you're past that age you won't be re-signed, will be cut, and you definitely won't be looked at as a free agent or grade. Not saying its right or wrong, but that is the way things are right now. Don't waste your time hoping on older free agents and trades.
I agree with his idea. Reed is past his prime. This team is rebuilding and getting rid of the older players. No need for Champ Bailey or Ed Reed types. If they were a player away from a deep play-off run then maybe bring in an older vet but that is not the case.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
User avatar
Laserman
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7355
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Laserman »

often injured, slow, well past his prime, pretty washed up. No thanks, He should have retired after winning his superbowl because he was done then
Angels Wings
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Angels Wings »

GBFavreFan wrote:I think Rick Spielman's MO is pretty clear, there will be no player older than like Adrian or Greg Jennings. If you're past that age you won't be re-signed, will be cut, and you definitely won't be looked at as a free agent or grade. Not saying its right or wrong, but that is the way things are right now. Don't waste your time hoping on older free agents and trades.
Matt Cassel is 31; Cullen Loeffler is 33, Brian Bobison is 30 but don't know if he's older than Greg
For those with wings, fly to your dreams
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Demi »

No thanks. Just got rid of a couple old washed up players. Don't need to sign anymore. Bad enough they extended BRod and signed Jennings well into their 30s.
Oakdale63
Backup
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Oakdale63 »

Your attempt to ridicule and demean him is quite embarrassing. You need to get some sleep, dude..holy crap.
dkoby
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:47 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by dkoby »

Eds health is not good, but I would like him to be a D backs coach. The guy is very smart.
The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds,the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps.
Elenore Roosevelt. 1945
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Purple bruise »

Oakdale63 wrote:Your attempt to ridicule and demean him is quite embarrassing. You need to get some sleep, dude..holy crap.
Dam someone must have missed taking their Midol today :wink:
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am

Re: Ed Reed

Post by chicagopurple »

enough of this desperate hope of catching a lucky year off a decaying veteran. This team needs to be run like a true contender. Draft good young talent when its cheap. DEVELOP the talent with great coaching (THAT would be refreshing, esp at QB). When your good players hit seniority and it would cost you a kings ransom to keep them, BE READY with new young talent and trade the vet when you can actually get something meaningfull for them. The Twins ran their club like this for decades and it was AWESOME. It made us Cubbie fans drool with envy. The Vikes have NEVER managed to do so.......
King James
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Ed Reed

Post by King James »

I've got two tickets to paradise
Won't you pack your bags, we'll leave tonight
I've got two tickets to paradise
I've got two tickets to paradise

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Ed Reed

Post by PacificNorseWest »

He just doesn't seem to fit with the direction that Zimmer and Spielman are going.

He didn't look to care much anymore with the Texans and if and when he decided to with the Jets, he was always an injury risk. I'd rather not give him a roster spot.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Even a few years ago, I would have said it would be a good idea. Not now. I don't mind paying for a few Vets, like we should have done with Winfield, when our CBs were awful, but Reed isn't worth it right now. Plus he isn't even as good now as Winfield was playing slow/nickel and not being the best at covering.
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Ed Reed

Post by Purple bruise »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:Even a few years ago, I would have said it would be a good idea. Not now. I don't mind paying for a few Vets, like we should have done with Winfield, when our CBs were awful, but Reed isn't worth it right now. Plus he isn't even as good now as Winfield was playing slow/nickel and not being the best at covering.
Of course a few years ago...Reed was the one the best safeties in the game IMO.
I am not sure what this means, "Plus he isn't even as good now as Winfield was playing slow/nickel and not being the best at covering.[/quote] :?: Any idea how long it might take you to get over the Winfield drama? He was let go because he was old and expensive. He went to Seattle and was cut. Winfield was a very good player but was never known for his covering abilities but he was one hell of a tackler.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Ed Reed

Post by PacificNorseWest »

To be fair to the situation, Seattle was a different scenario all-together with the depth they had in their secondary.

I think the speculation is frivolous at this point now though. Maybe he would have helped considerably. Maybe just a little or maybe not at all or even worse. Now, he was just a part of a different era. Vikings are onto the next one. :confused:
Post Reply