I don't think either quality makes someone a better fan.PurpleKoolaid wrote:Its being realistic over being homers. Which do you define as the better fan Jim?
However, you're not being realistic. You're being pessimistic, predicting and expecting the worst possible outcome. A realist acknowledges the possibility of a negative outcome while also acknowledging other possibilities. He doesn't expect or predict a negative outcome in situations where that's not even close to a sure thing.
First, I don't "blindly" follow anybody. Second, the Coach of the Year award isn't based on what a coach does the following year. There was nothing to "pan out". The award is presented to the NFL head coach who the Associated Press believe has done the most outstanding job in a particular season of working with the talent he has at his disposal. What happens the next year is irrelevant. the award is based on purely on the season in which it is awarded.Some blindly think management knows what its doing. Others, the coaching staff. I believe you were wrong on both accounts. If fact I remember asking you specifically what makes a good HC. And why should Fraizer get COTY last year. And if im not mistaken, not one of your arguments paned out.
And both the QB and HC are gone. I am a pessimist/realist, I admit that. I am also right more times then wrong.
A "pessimist/realist" is essentially a pessimist and as TexasVike said, the inherent difficulty of success in the NFL makes it easy to be right most of the time when you're also naysaying most of the time. The odds are simply in your favor.
There is no "little group" and I don't think anybody is saying they're superior to you. They're poking fun at your relentless "boy who cried wolf" negativity.But if you guys in your little group get off on thinking your superior to the 'negative' crowd, pat yourselves on the back, and more power to you. Because neither of us will get anything we want till we find that QB. And a real competent GM