Purple bruise wrote:
I get it, you are one of the many Ponder haters that will be served up a whole lot of crow

Uh oh, it looks like I need to update the Ponder apologists hand book again ... section K) When <insert excuse here> is refuted with evidence, ignore and move on lol.
Reignman wrote:A) The offensive line didn't give him time B) We have the worst receivers in NFL history C) It's Musgraves play calling D) He had no training camp as a rookie E) He's only had 26 career starts F) We're a run first team G) <insert random future hall of fame QB's name here> had similar numbers at this stage of his career too H) He's only doing what the coaches told him to do I) The defenses blitz too much J) He's a 3 year project
But I'll happily eat my crow when Ponder delivers it, but how do we actually determine if he's the one delivering and not just along for the ride xD? I mean the pro Ponder crowd considers a 91 yard, 0 TD game to be "good". I mean heck, we're not even on the same page when we define the term "good" lol. I'm just curious, if we won a game with a 46 yard 4 INT performance from Ponder would that still be considered a good game for Ponder?
Mothman wrote:I really hope Christian Ponder has an outstanding year.
Despite my love of bashing all things Ponder, I hope so too, but again, I have a feeling we don't share the same definition of of the term "outstanding" when it comes to Ponder xD. But yeah, I'm not hoping for him to fail, I don't want to go through this grooming process again. Lets all agree we should go back to stop gaps if this Ponder experiment doesn't work out. At least until AD retires.
80 PurplePride 84 wrote:It's ok to not think highly of Ponder
Thank you!
Purple bruise wrote:This is an interesting point of view:
http://www.dailynorseman.com/2013/5/9/4 ... -last-year
Fanposts:
TVS: Ponder as Important As Peterson last year? "By now, if you're an addicted Vikings fan, like myself, you have heard the reports of Rick Speilman stating to NFL Network that Christian Ponder was as important to the Minnesota Vikings run to the playoffs last year, as the MVP, Adrian Peterson. This report has inspired me to create a new article in the Vikings Scoop's In-Depth Series. (READ ON)
That's almost the most absurd article I've ever read. You can almost see him squirm as he actually tried to twist the data to fit Spielmans asinine comment. I think it was more about Spielman stroking Ponders ego because anyone that seriously believes Ponder was even remotely as important as AD last year, is not only insulting AD, but they're beyond DELUSIONAL! ~30th ranked QB != MVP RB. The season went more like this, Ponder relied heavily on then MVP candidate Harvin in the first half of the season and then MVP AD carried him in the 2nd half of the season. And just because AD was on a touch count the first half of the season doesn't mean the defenses didn't have to game plan or account for him. Sheeez, the guy was still among the league leaders in rushing by mid season.
MelanieMFunk wrote:I was at the game, too--Row 4 over by CheeseFree and Diggz!

Actually, I attended 4 games last year--all wins. And I had season tickets for the '09 season and--we obviously won them all. And my overall record is 16-5. I think that's pretty solid. I'm the good luck charm!

Well, along with Favre probably. lol. Ooooh, PLUS...I attended the last two draft parties and look at how those turned out. Juuuust sayin'.

Ha, now I know who to blame when things go terribly wrong from now on. We lost? Was Melanie there? No?! OMG why not?

"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh