I understand what you're saying and don't really disagree. What I'm saying is that the Vikings have needs that should be addressed in the draft and they are MLB, DT, CB, and WR. In my view, the Vikings have enough picks to address all of them. I have no problem with the Vikings drafting for defense in R1 and R2 if they also pick a decent WR or two in the next couple rounds. I like the WRs that Jim mentioned, especially Dobson, and I believe they could be beneficial right away.mansquatch wrote:Los Perros you are of course correct on inujuries. However, my challenge to you is to say how is the situation at WR any better than the one at CB? What happens if/when Cook and/or Robinson get hurt? I would say that the WR apocalypse injury wise was the same as the plague of injuries that hit the secondary in 2011. IMO, the 2011 bunch takes the cake for total fail, ergo, we need depth back there.
Likewise, after KWill, then who at DT?
I agree that they could very easily justify a WR pick. My point is just to say that likewise, they could also go the other direction I outlined and be equally justified. My argument on the Jennings signing is that it shored up this position group to some extent. How much it did that is in the eye of the beholder. This isn’t to say it isn’t a need, it is, but with GJ on the roster you are now in a situation where you can let BPA rule the day between the 4 positions.
I think that without Winfield on the roster the situation at CB is scary. If one of those guys go down, our pass defense could be significantly compromised if the next man up is Scherels against 3 WR sets.
What would really bother me and make me seriously wonder what the Vikings are doing is if they absolutely ignore the WR need in the draft. That would be madness, IMHO. If Spielman and Frazier are both sold on Ponder, then they sure as heck better surround him with better overall talent at WR. I see that as being a no-brainer for any responsible GM and HC.