Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:52 am
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Webb has been practicing and throwing footballs to receivers all year long. He's the backup for cryin' out loud. He can do it! What's with the doubt? Besides, the "team" has been improving, winning and gaining confidence. Anything can happen!
Addendum: I'm sure the Vikes have been getting some cold workouts in as well as the packers. The body can learn to acclimate quickly, especially in a week's time.
...wisdom
Addendum: I'm sure the Vikes have been getting some cold workouts in as well as the packers. The body can learn to acclimate quickly, especially in a week's time.
...wisdom
...spirits in the wind and the trees
-
- Starter
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:44 pm
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Hope I'm wrong master YodaJust Me wrote: [Yoda Voice] So certain are you [/Yoda Voice]

-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Yeah... I feel bad for him and the franchise, as this would have been a defining game IMO.Purplemania wrote: I doubt it. Personally, I don't like Ponder, but I think he has earned this start.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:44 pm
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Hope I'm wrong master YodaJust Me wrote: [Yoda Voice] So certain are you [/Yoda Voice]

- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
if we win this will either be a QB MIRACLE..and touch off a QB controversy
OR
AP will once again strap the whole friggin team on his back and carry us like no one else can.....
OR
AP will once again strap the whole friggin team on his back and carry us like no one else can.....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:41 pm
- Location: Pennslyvania
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
let go JOE WEBB WOOT WOOT!
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Webb makes Tarvaris Jackson looked well prepared QB
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
I hate to agree with that but I think you are rightjackal wrote:Webb makes Tarvaris Jackson looked well prepared QB

I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
[Yoda Voice] Feeling foolish, now I am [/Yoda Voice]billingsviking wrote: Hope I'm wrong master Yoda

I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
- Laserman
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
- Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Pretty funny now in the 4rth quarter seeing these Webb fans 

-
- Transition Player
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:01 am
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
He was 11 for 30, with 180 yards. 36% passes completed with 6 yards per pass. One TD, one INT, with some of those yards coming in garbage time.
It would have been difficult for ANY QB to come into that situation. He was inaccurate early on but picked up later. Stuff like that, sailing balls over people's heads, takes doing a couple of times to get right and if his first start had been week four who knows but that he would have been a very good QB by now.
Tough game.
It would have been difficult for ANY QB to come into that situation. He was inaccurate early on but picked up later. Stuff like that, sailing balls over people's heads, takes doing a couple of times to get right and if his first start had been week four who knows but that he would have been a very good QB by now.
Tough game.
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
The guy is a great athlete but he will never be a NFL QB he just cant throw , any high school QB could throw most of those passes and now we know what the coaches have known all along , that is the reason we drafted Ponder when we did .DarthBrooks wrote:He was 11 for 30, with 180 yards. 36% passes completed with 6 yards per pass. One TD, one INT, with some of those yards coming in garbage time.
It would have been difficult for ANY QB to come into that situation. He was inaccurate early on but picked up later. Stuff like that, sailing balls over people's heads, takes doing a couple of times to get right and if his first start had been week four who knows but that he would have been a very good QB by now.
Tough game.
LETS GO VIKINGS ! 

Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Webb was 3-11 for 6 yards in the first half. That's Spergon Wynn-esque.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 8:55 pm
- Location: Olympia, Washington
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Webb's Stat line:
11-30 for 180 yards and 1 TD and 1 INT for a 54.9 QB rating
Some other random (?) player's stat line in Lambeau this season:
12-25 for 119 yards and 1 TD and 2 INT's for a 41.9 QB rating (*in better weather conditions, *without playoff pressure, *with a gameplan actually designed for his strengths, *with a very successful running game to take off the pressure).
Sorry, but I just don't see the absolute certainty you guys all have in saying that this game dooms Joe Webb's ability to be a QB. Yes, it looked bad. But even playing this bad he still outgained the yardage total of the other guy who shall remain nameless in fully half of his 16 games. And against a tough opponent on the road, without the benefit of 21 prior starts.
Yes. There was some garbage time stat padding. But Ponder couldn't even do that early in the season. Hence, three games with under 100 yards passing.
For me, the most damning thing about Webb is that Frazier (who I like as a coach and trust a lot) has decided that Ponder is better at this point, or at least not worse enough to put his job on the line fighting against Spielman's designated QB.
11-30 for 180 yards and 1 TD and 1 INT for a 54.9 QB rating
Some other random (?) player's stat line in Lambeau this season:
12-25 for 119 yards and 1 TD and 2 INT's for a 41.9 QB rating (*in better weather conditions, *without playoff pressure, *with a gameplan actually designed for his strengths, *with a very successful running game to take off the pressure).
Sorry, but I just don't see the absolute certainty you guys all have in saying that this game dooms Joe Webb's ability to be a QB. Yes, it looked bad. But even playing this bad he still outgained the yardage total of the other guy who shall remain nameless in fully half of his 16 games. And against a tough opponent on the road, without the benefit of 21 prior starts.
Yes. There was some garbage time stat padding. But Ponder couldn't even do that early in the season. Hence, three games with under 100 yards passing.
For me, the most damning thing about Webb is that Frazier (who I like as a coach and trust a lot) has decided that Ponder is better at this point, or at least not worse enough to put his job on the line fighting against Spielman's designated QB.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:41 pm
- Location: Pennslyvania
Re: Ponder inactive, Webb to start
Joe Webb's days as a Viking is probably coming towards an end due to his performance tonight. I love the guy and I was rooting my #### off for him for the past two years but I personally think Spielman and Fraizer are going to move on. Sucks when things dont go your way .