Re: Only 4 teams in the NFC have a winning record...
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:50 am
the nfc is really tough. doesnt matter though. denver is going to do serious damage to whomever they play.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
Yeah, and if you take away each divisions leader, there are THREE teams with more than one win and only the bears have a positive record so it's wide #### open. That means we're 1 win away from tied with 6th place and the final wild card with 13 weeks left. ^_^Eli wrote:Oh, oh..... One win and the playoff talk is starting.
last week we were going 0-16Eli wrote:Oh, oh..... One win and the playoff talk is starting.
And we lost to two of them.fiestavike wrote:I'm just saying.
lolOrion wrote:im scared for our game in seattle
Couldn't agree more, it's amazing how we get that "average" QB play and the offense scores the most points by far. Suddenly the O-line barely gives up one sack, the receivers get a ton of YAC, and the defense holds onto the big lead compared to the crappy 6 point leads we had to work with before.80 PurplePride 84 wrote:
Dontcha know? The difference between 0-16 and 10-6 is going from a terrible QB to a below average QB. Nothing else matters.
I don't know if this counts as "playoff talk" or not, but we're currently the 13th seed (based on tie-breakers) xD. If we go 9-3 and ..... hahaha I'll just stop myself right there.Eli wrote:Oh, oh..... One win and the playoff talk is starting.
This!mondry wrote: Couldn't agree more, it's amazing how we get that "average" QB play and the offense scores the most points by far. Suddenly the O-line barely gives up one sack, the receivers get a ton of YAC, and the defense holds onto the big lead compared to the crappy 6 point leads we had to work with before.
It makes sense to me anyway, if you're losing games by 1 point and 4 points, etc that hey, maybe a little better QB play, the most important position in sports, might make the difference.
80 PurplePride 84 wrote:We're on pace to break passing yardage allowed records. They could bring back Jackson and the results would be almost the same. You're not gonna play the Steelers every week.
Did Ponder let Devin Hester run(return) all over him? Did Ponder let Martellus Bennett and Jordan Cameron beat him with the game on the line? Yes he threw some atrocious INTs and couldn't sustain drives, but who's to say Cassel woulda been turnover free? He got away with a few today. And it's not like they were only scoring 10 points a game with Ponder either.
FWIW I DON"T think Ponder should get his job back and Cassel is the better QB but I love how everyone is acting like we'd be 4-0 or 3-1 had Cassel been starting from week 1. 2-2 is far more likely.
Lol that's a good point. Crazy how they defend everything about Floater, then another QB goes out there and puts an end to all their theories ... oh ummm the o-line is bad ... oh the receivers can't get the 10yd separation required by Ponder. Nope it was the QB all along. The entire offense suddenly looked good and now they look for everything to nit pick about Cassel. My personal favorite is, Cassel shoulda had some turnovers which is some how worse than Ponder having a boat load of actual turnovers.VikingPaul73 wrote:well which is it? The Ponder lovers say some are horrible fans for rooting for losses and a better draft pick....and then at the same time say Cassel is only average and not the answer, so we're crazy for being happy at seeing some, ANY improvement at QB play. Well....WHICH IS IT!!!!?????
To your point, before we get to happy and excited, we played a NAD Steelers team.80 PurplePride 84 wrote: Which is what?
All I was saying is some around hate Ponder so much they think this team would be a 4-0 had Cassel started from the get-go which I highly doubt.