Page 63 of 147

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:53 am
by dead_poet
:shock:

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:55 am
by akvikingsfan
dead_poet wrote::shock:
That was the exact same reaction I had when I read it. I see a ban coming....

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:01 am
by purplehaze
Clean up in isle 32 please. lol

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:54 am
by yezzir
APeterson28 wrote:deleted
Somebody's Ambien didn't wear off overnight.

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:30 pm
by glg
um, wow :shock:

:ban:

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:34 pm
by PurpleMustReign
glg wrote:um, wow :shock:

:ban:

That is an understatement, lol...

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:35 pm
by PsyDanny
glg wrote:um, wow :shock:

:ban:

Umm, you mean the other dude. Not me, I hope.

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:57 pm
by glg
PsyDanny wrote:
Umm, you mean the other dude. Not me, I hope.
you seem to be still posting ;)

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:42 pm
by PsyDanny
glg wrote: you seem to be still posting ;)

Cool.

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:55 am
by dead_poet
Stadium article in the New York Times:

Fiscal and Political Shifts Cloud Stadium Push
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/sport ... 2&emc=eta1

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:03 am
by purple guy
That was a good read, thanks for the link. The clock is ticking on the Vikings time in Minny Im afraid. I just dont see anyway the state agrees to pay for any of it, and I support that stance by the state, actually. If Wilfs was serious about not signing another lease in the MetroDome without a stadium deal, Id say the Vikings are a few games away from being sold and/or relocated.

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:31 pm
by CCthebest
80 PurplePride 84 wrote:I usually not optimistic about anything. But I think the State will cave at the last possible second. I'm talking about a few days before the lease expires.

Until then they'll probably just play hardball trying to either A) get Wilf to throw up more money or B) come up with a plan to build at the Metrodome site or C) both.
I was kinda wondering/hoping the same thing. While I know most NFL stadiums are much better then the Dome, I always had fun there. But i dont think its a money maker.

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:41 am
by dead_poet
#1: Stadium report: Vikings plan 'aggressive,' 'unrealistic'
A highly-anticipated report on building a new Minnesota Vikings stadium in Arden Hills will stop short of advising against the project, but says that a Ramsey County sales tax plan to help finance it will “compromise the county’s and the region’s ability to finance other projects.”

A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Council, which is releasing the report Wednesday, confirmed key elements of the report, which casts the Vikings plan to open a new stadium in Arden Hills by 2015 as having “an aggressive schedule that is unrealistic.”

The report, which totals nearly 200 pages, in addition identified $39 million in unfunded costs for the stadium.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/sta ... 63693.html

-----
#2: Vikings fire off letter criticizing referendum
The Minnesota Vikings said Tuesday that a countywide referendum on a proposed half-cent sales tax hike to help build a new football stadium would delay the project by two years and add at least $110 million to the proposal.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/sta ... 61083.html

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:29 am
by PurpleMustReign
The proposed Minnesota Vikings stadium tax won't face a public vote in Ramsey County, but a report to be released Wednesday by the Metropolitan Council raised new questions about the viability of the Arden Hills site.
From the StarTrib. this is good right? It has a better chance of passing right? Or am I confused? :confused:

Re: Stadium thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:43 am
by purple guy
PurpleMustReign wrote: From the StarTrib. this is good right? It has a better chance of passing right? Or am I confused? :confused:
You are right, thats a good sign, but it might be too little too late.