Jordysghost wrote: Or they may feel there is adequate enough players at that position that remain available, and didn't want to reach on a need.
I think Spielman simply isn't willing to invest in interior offensive linemen until Day 3.
Moderator: Moderators
Jordysghost wrote: Or they may feel there is adequate enough players at that position that remain available, and didn't want to reach on a need.
He actually has that tattooed on a "not for public viewing" part of his body, my sources tell me.Motorman wrote:
I think Spielman simply isn't willing to invest in interior offensive linemen until Day 3.
Texas Vike wrote:He actually has that tattooed on a "not for public viewing" part of his body, my sources tell me.![]()
He does and they're highly effective when it comes to the passing game and protecting the QB, as the stats below illustrate.The guy sticks to his convictions, doesn't he?
It really did and in no small part because of what the neighbors hauled in. That said, people are correct to point out that it's a pick made with an eye toward the future. I hope Zimmer and Jerry Gray can mold him into a good NFL corner.Texas Vike wrote:Looking back over day two, it's hard not to feel a little disappointed, especially when you notice what the neighbors hauled in:
Lions: A'Shawn Robinson (projected as 1st rounder, was a BEAST at Alabama)
Pack: Jason Spriggs (supposedly the Pack considered him in the 1st; we sure could have used him!)
Bears: Cody Whitehair and some draft picks for moving back 15 spots.
And we took a CB on the short side despite the fact that our coach (known as a "DB Whisperer") has publicly stated that he prefers taller corners.
I'm fine with delayed gratification, so the trade out of round 3 leaves me indifferent; I recognize that the RICKER will have ammo for next year.
It just felt like "one of those days"
Wow. Ugly.Motorrrrrrrrrrrrrrman wrote:
He does and they're highly effective when it comes to the passing game and protecting the QB, as the stats below illustrate.
Vikings passing game rankings since Spielman arrived in 2007:
2007: 28th (38 sacks)
2008: 25th (43 sacks)
2009: 8th (33 sacks)
2010: 26th (36 sacks)
2011: 28th (49 sacks)
2012: 31st (32 sacks)
2013: 23rd (44 sacks)
2014: 28th (51 sacks)
2015: 31st (45 sacks)
As you can see, things have only been better in this department since he became GM!
Plus, don't forget: too many men on the field!Texas Vike wrote:Wow. Ugly.
Wait, what's that anomaly there in 2009? OH, right, Favre. With just a little better protection in that street yard fight of a game vs. the Saints and we might have finally taken the trophy. Sigh.
Sorry, he was quiet.dead_poet wrote:Did Rick trade anyone for one of my centers during the night?
Me neither. Worth noting? The 2009 anomaly shows our overall offense rank was top 10, but we STILL gave up a ton of sacks that year. i.e. we were good because of Favre, not because we blocked well that year.Motorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrman wrote: Plus, don't forget: too many men on the field!
Anyway, yes, those stats are ugly and if anybody wonders why I'm not always so enthusiastic about Spielman and his choices, they should help illustrate it. The Vikes passing game has been floundering for the majority of the past decade, it's been getting worse, and I'm not convinced he knows how to put together an effective passing attack.