Re: Kickers?
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:17 pm
The season isn't lost. 

A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
And that's why you are a Lions fan.Iron Lion wrote:
As far as what he's done or what type of person he is, who cares? The only thing sacred is winning.
Did you expect Dan Bailey or something?? He was pretty solid the last year or twoKidfozzy wrote:Kai Forbath? Gross.
Forbaths 0-19 % should be 97.8%.Pondering Her Percy wrote:
For anyone saying Forbath is "gross". This just shows you how gross Walsh was. Forbath has been a pretty solid kicker
2 years.HardcoreVikesFan wrote:So how long until Kai Forbath misses his first extra point?
Lol at the boogers comment.Dmizzle0 wrote:Maybe he's gross because he eats his boogers....jk
But seriously I hope this moves helps out both sides. Maybe another team is better for Walsh mindset and Forbath gives us those points that we've been missing.
Question. How is he 0-19 range 100% when hr misses in 2012 and 2014?
Who here hasn't done that at some time in their life?Dmizzle0 wrote:Maybe he's gross because he eats his boogers....jk
But seriously I hope this moves helps out both sides. Maybe another team is better for Walsh mindset and Forbath gives us those points that we've been missing.
Question. How is he 0-19 range 100% when hr misses in 2012 and 2014?
NFL teams should almost never invest heavily in a kicker. Kickers can go south at any time and for any reason, and few of them are markedly better than those you would sign off the street to replace them.
If the Vikings weren’t going to release Walsh after his missed kick against Seattle, they should have when he demonstrated, after an offseason of fine-tuning and mood-enhancing, that he was unreliable in the 2016 season opener.
If he wasn’t fixed after eight months of preparation, he was bound to cost this team this season.
The most damaging part of the Blair Walsh Project was the contract extension, which cost the Vikings actual money and cap space that could have been used on an actual football player, the kind that needs to be replaced because he has sacrificed a knee, synapse or spleen for the franchise.
Was he saying this when they extended him though? Sounds like a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking to me.Texas Vike wrote:Souhan has a piece on how the Vikings messed up with Walsh.
http://www.startribune.com/enamored-by- ... 401400585/
PacificNorseWest wrote:
Was he saying this when they extended him though? Sounds like a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking to me.
I would have been more impressed if he had written this just after his contract was signed. It's easy to be critical after the fact. If Walsh was 100% this year his contract wouldn't even be and issue.PacificNorseWest wrote: Was he saying this when they extended him though? Sounds like a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking to me.