A lot of Vikings fans seem to like Ponder, and think he's better than everyone makes him out to be. (Including the Vikings front office, coaches, and other teams, apparently)I know a lot of people don't like Ponder. I just don't think he is a bad as everyone makes him out to be. But that's just me. He will be gone next year and we won't have to talk about him anymore.
The stat your using has a lot of variables. Including the defense. They allowed a lot of points...which is going to allow more scoring opportunities for Ponder. Ponder not sustaining drives and allowing the other team the ball, and likely a score considering the defense, is going to allow Ponder more scoring opportunities. How did the defenses the two played affect the number? Home/Away? How many scoring opportunities did the opposing offense get not only because of turnovers, but a lack of sustained drives from the Vikings offense?
And yet the people who's jobs were on the line, replaced him with the other option. Which, stats be damned, looked like a pretty nice upgrade over Ponder watching the two of them on the field. And the front office not only resigned what was apparently not a better option, but he ended up getting the started job, along with another 1st round pick on a player already ahead of Ponder on the depth chart.The scary thought here is that as bad as he was, Ponder was probably the best option.
We all watched Ponder last year, and Cassell last year, and after watching the two it's insane to me that some people still feel like they're the same QB, or close enough that there should even be a discussion. And here we are this year with Cassell starting, Ponder #3, getting little to no preseason snaps, and even missing out on snaps in practice.
Maybe Ponder just held this team hostage so long some fans got Stockholm syndrome?
