VikingLord wrote:I'm not so sure about that. Teo was productive at Notre Dame, but his stock might have been influenced a bit by his team going undefeated and some of the hype surrounding him, most of it created by Notre Dame itself.
I don't know about that. I thought Notre Dame earned their hype in 2012. They weren't just hyped because they were Notre Dame. They went into the season unranked and finished undefeated after facing some tough competition. Their defense led the way for them and T'eo was the leader of that defense and a strong performer. If his stock was influenced by the success his team had, it was also influenced by the fact that he was a leader and key performer on that team.
When Teo runs at the Combine or his pro day, don't be surprised if his results suggest a much lower round grade than the hype would indicate. Also, his performance against the Tide left a lot to be desired as well. He was really exposed in a way few future NFL stars are against college competition. Granted, Alabama isn't your uncle's college team in terms of talent, but Teo was really steamrolled, and not just once, but repeatedly. I would hope he could have won a few of the battles in that game, but I didn't see it.
I've seen good NFL LBs steamrolled in games too so I wouldn't read too much into it. Because Alabama isn't your uncle's college team in terms of talent, they may also have brought a level of talent T'eo wasn't prepared to face because he hadn't really faced it before. We all know that when players come to the NFL there's a period of adjustment as they get used to the speed of the game and the size and strength of some of their opponents. They usually work to get stronger too so even though T'eo had a rough outing against Alabama, it doesn't mean that game represents his ceiling. Like many players, he may be capable of adjusting and excelling at the next level once he has the experience and coaching to help him do so.
I see Teo as an above-average player who has been seriously hyped up. Based on what I expect him to do during the pre-draft evaluations, I bet his numbers don't come in better than average for the players at his position. Normally, a guy like that at his position would be looking at the 3rd-4th round.
Based on measurables? I doubt it because
production matters and his combine measurables will be considered along with his production. He'd have to perform at a level radically below expectations at the combine to be considered a 3rd or 4th round player. Remember, this guy was considered by many to be a first round prospect after the 2011 season, before Notre Dame's heavily-hyped undefeated season in 2012.
Of course, everything is relative, but if the Vikes do take him at #23 I will consider it a reach, and not just based on the hoax or even what happened against Alabama, but just what I think he's going to bring to the field at the pro level.
You might consider it a reach but considering that he's ben viewed as a first round-caliber talent for a long time, you'll probably be in the minority.
If the Vikes do go MLB at #23, a guy like Alec Ogletree makes much more sense. Get a guy with range who can cover in a Tampa 2. Ogletree would be able to do that. Teo is going to be a guy in the Brinkley mode, although maybe not even as good at stopping the run as Brinkley.
[/quote]
Ogletree would have better range in coverage but if you're concerned about LBs getting steamrolled, he's arguably a riskier prospect than T'eo, especially if he were to play inside. Of course, they both offer upside and downside, but Ogletree's 4 game suspension for reportedly violating Georgia's drug policy is a red flag that deserves attention, especially since my understanding is that the school reserves 4 game suspensions for players who have tested positive a second time.