Young Theodore Bridgewater

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Purple Reign
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1293
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by Purple Reign »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: That could be the difference between a veteran and a rookie with only 10 starts under his belt. Teddy is definitely continuing to improve week after week no matter what way you look at it
I was only responding to the statement that Teddy did the job better today than Stafford (when obviously he didn't do everything better today - especially where it counts the most as the 'job' is to win games). That's not a knock on Teddy as he did have a decent day and he is improving, not denying that.
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by PacificNorseWest »

I assume Jennings is the "washed up vet?"

I'll respectively disagree with that. I think the perception of his talent has been marginalized by him coming to Minnesota. I think he's still a very good receiver who has been in a bad spot, QB-wise.

Had he stayed in GB with Rodgers, I feel like he would still be looked at as one of the more consistent and better WR'a around -- ala Reggie Wayne of a few years ago.
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by 808vikingsfan »

Instead, we're picking through a handful of marginal mistakes to help explain a two-point loss against the NFC North divisional leader. Bridgewater completed 31 passes for 315 yards Sunday, but three misfires scuttled the Vikings' chances.
In the 15th week of his first NFL season, Bridgewater has dismissed the macro and pushed us into a micro discussion about the few plays he didn't make.

Teddy Bridgewater changes conversation
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by PacificNorseWest »

Yeah, it's encouraging -- his progression.

I found myself burying my head in my folded arms on the table after both picks because I knew the Vikings needed to epitomize efficiency on offense in order to win this game. It was tough because Teddy is a rookie and rookies make those boneheaded mistakes, but even tougher because I already hold him to such high standards that I didn't think he'd make those mistakes. Still recoverable at that point in the game, but still crucial. In the end, it hurt them. Blair sucked, but you don't want to rely on a kicker like that.

I Give Teddy a C grade for the game and I have been one of his biggest advocates. The C is more because of that aforementioned 'new standard' he's held to in my eyes and that the article speaks to. The conversation really has changed. He's that dirty 'P' word (potential) to a degree closer to being realized than to being a bust, and because of it, he'll need to tighten up those few mistakes going forward.

I'm excited. I also know better. I feel he's already so close to being what this team has been waiting for and I felt that way when wanting Minnesota to draft him. The biggest worry now is the feeling of being letdown -- again. Pull through for us, Teddy.

/preach
shannontw
Veteran
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by shannontw »

If Blair Makes those FG. We would be saying. Bridgewater played a pretty good game today. i cant believe we had a 26 yard FG blocked. Like Really?????????????
shannontw
Veteran
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by shannontw »

Teddy has already exceeded my expectations ad a Rookie. I will be more worried next year because i dont wont him to regress. To all the people who wanted Johnny Football. even though its 1 game. dude looks like Ponder out there almost. Just more athletic
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by DK Sweets »

As far as the first INT goes, I'm not sure that it's fair to put the blame on any one player. Johnson ran into a defender on his cut and Teddy threw a high ball, but if Johnson had a clean route, he could have made a play on the ball. I don't have a great angle on it, but it appears as if the ball was released before Johnson was stopped. Johnson probably could have done a better job breaking off the route, and Teddy could have put the pass into a safer position, but I would rather see these types of growing pains than see a scared offensive plan. Two Lions player played well in coverage, and two Vikings failed to adjust. It illustrates how much of a team sport football really is.
PurpleHalo
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:28 am
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by PurpleHalo »

DKSweets wrote:As far as the first INT goes, I'm not sure that it's fair to put the blame on any one player. Johnson ran into a defender on his cut and Teddy threw a high ball, but if Johnson had a clean route, he could have made a play on the ball. I don't have a great angle on it, but it appears as if the ball was released before Johnson was stopped. Johnson probably could have done a better job breaking off the route, and Teddy could have put the pass into a safer position, but I would rather see these types of growing pains than see a scared offensive plan. Two Lions player played well in coverage, and two Vikings failed to adjust. It illustrates how much of a team sport football really is.
We are talking about 2 young players, still gonna be some mistakes.
This space available for rent.
PurpleHalo
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:28 am
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by PurpleHalo »

shannontw wrote:Teddy has already exceeded my expectations ad a Rookie. I will be more worried next year because i dont wont him to regress. To all the people who wanted Johnny Football. even though its 1 game. dude looks like Ponder out there almost. Just more athletic
Teddy has quality people around him in Zimmer and Turner, I don't expect a regress. The playbook has opened a little more the last few weeks. And with them being eliminated expect that to open even more.
This space available for rent.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

PacificNorseWest wrote:I assume Jennings is the "washed up vet?"

I'll respectively disagree with that. I think the perception of his talent has been marginalized by him coming to Minnesota. I think he's still a very good receiver who has been in a bad spot, QB-wise.

Had he stayed in GB with Rodgers, I feel like he would still be looked at as one of the more consistent and better WR'a around -- ala Reggie Wayne of a few years ago.
Thielen would be a star if Rogers was his QB. I think there are some people here who expected Teddy to be like the greater QBs playing now, instead of playing like some of those QBs played there rookie year. Teddy has the most beat up, and just plain bad Oline, out there. And no running game. Even though Asiata played his heart out yesterday. We are going to have to pick up a legitimate threat to go along with McKinnon. And I am better we will have to drop a TE to keep Asiata.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

PurpleKoolaid wrote: Thielen would be a star if Rogers was his QB. I think there are some people here who expected Teddy to be like the greater QBs playing now, instead of playing like some of those QBs played there rookie year. Teddy has the most beat up, and just plain bad Oline, out there. And no running game. Even though Asiata played his heart out yesterday. We are going to have to pick up a legitimate threat to go along with McKinnon. And I am better we will have to drop a TE to keep Asiata.
I don't understand your man crush on Thielen. What can you even go off of??? Preseason?? Well, Rodney Smith always had good preseason games and he's gone and sitting on the Browns practice squad so preseason doesn't really say a whole lot. You always say Thielen could do this, Thielen could do that and Thielen is better than this guy and that guy. It's pure speculation that has no real backing behind it

As for Jennings, myself and others have continued to say that he is a very reliable veteran. Not washed up by any means which is why I would like to keep him. He's never going to light the world on fire for us so I wouldn't mind if he took a paycut down the road but he's definitely a valuable veteran leader to have on this offense. Especially if we plan on brining in another young rookie stud WR next year
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
frosted
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2157
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by frosted »

Teddy Bridgewater changes conversation

http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikin ... nversation
I found Sunday to be a turning point of sorts for Bridgewater, the Vikings and outside perception. The conversation has changed.

We're no longer debating whether Bridgewater, the No. 32 overall pick of the draft, can play. His steady ascendance continued Sunday, his third consecutive game with at least a 70 percent completion rate. Bridgewater threw 41 passes in a pass-first game plan against one of the NFL's top defenses, and it seems moot to break down whether it means Bridgewater can be the Vikings' long-term answer. He is well on his way to demonstrating it. The Vikings are 4-3 in his past seven starts, with all three losses by one score, and the organization has already committed to it.

Instead, we're picking through a handful of marginal mistakes to help explain a two-point loss against the NFC North divisional leader. Bridgewater completed 31 passes for 315 yards Sunday, but three misfires scuttled the Vikings' chances.
Worth a read - my thoughts regarding Ted are pretty well summed up by Seifert.
Last edited by frosted on Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by Mothman »

frosted wrote:Teddy Bridgewater changes conversation

http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikin ... nversation
Worth a read - my thoughts regarding Ted are pretty well summed up by Goessling.
A "handful of marginal mistakes"? If "three misfires scuttled the Vikings' chances" then they weren't marginal mistakes.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by DK Sweets »

Mothman wrote: A "handful of marginal mistakes"? If "three misfires scuttled the Vikings' chances" then they weren't marginal mistakes.
I think it depends on how you view the word. I don't remember seeing a single throw in the game where I though "What the hell was he thinking?". Some QBs, even veterans like Cutler and Romo, still have throws like that.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: Young Theodore Bridgewater

Post by losperros »

frosted wrote:Teddy Bridgewater changes conversation

http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikin ... nversation

Worth a read - my thoughts regarding Ted are pretty well summed up by Goessling.
Thanks for the link. I pretty much agree with the article.

I'm glad Zimmer feels that the more Teddy plays, the more he's improving. Ultimately, whether Bridgewater can continue to learn his craft will determine his success level.
Post Reply