Re: Vikings/Saints Post-Game
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:55 pm
They can complain all they want....game is in the books 

A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
I called it 28-10 Vikings but I'll take the win either way. And yeah, this should shut the 'Kirk-can't-win-the-big-ones' crowd up. I am so stoked about the momentum we seem to have on our way thru the playoffs. I believe we are the healthiest team still in the game. Look out SF, Good Kirk is on his way to the west coast.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:44 pmThey probably sound disgusted because they all look like idiots for saying the saints will win by 100. I’ve been following the game all week like most of us have. I have not seen one single person predict the Vikings to win (other than on here)40for60 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:35 pm Harrison and Dungy looked and sounded disgusted like it was as bad as the Rams-Saints game last year. Can't believe it. Harrison is usually anti-Vikings and Cousins (the throw to Thielen was all him and no credit to Kirk) but Dungy is usually pro-Vikings. Why is there always something where the Vikings can't get credit for an awesome game? They slowed the replay way down - see how the defensive back's head goes back? Well, he was looking up at the ball morons... C![]()
ould it have been called? Maybe but that would have been very weak. Recalled? No.
I said all week I had a weird feeling about this game and that we play so much better when we’re viewed as underdogs. I called 27-24 Vikings but 26-20 sounds way better.
Maybe this will finally put the Kirk cousins and big game narrative to an end. Because that was by FAR the biggest game of his career and he couldn’t have played better on that final OT drive
Save that ssshite for the 4th quarter dagger when you are up two scores.fiestavike wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:21 pm Great game! Cousins showed up and was composed throughout. The defense played really well. The running game was strong...though I wish they would have been stronger down the stretch. Good to see the vikings willing to take some chances offensively in overtime. Stefanski...enough with the stupid double reverse plays and the toss sweep wasnt working. Why keep losing yards and letting the pressure off the defense with that nonsense?
They did review it. There was a statement from the NY officials, who said there was contact by both players and nothing that rose to the level of PI. It was a very fast review, which they credited to FOX for providing lots of angles (and which tells you how easy a call it was). They just didn’t announce it on the field.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:32 pmIt is funny because the Saints fans aren't even complaining about it.Texas Vike wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:24 pm Tony Dungy just expressed his opinion that Rudy's TD should have been flagged, so I guess that's the narrative we have to hear going forward.
Honestly, I thought for sure it would get called on replay, given our history.
I am shocked the NFL had the good sense to not review that play. Should have been called on the field, but since it wasn't, taking away that TD would have been the worst thing the NFL could have done.
Karma is a b!tch. Ever since bountygate they have had bad things happen to them in playoff games. It's the Farve Curse!Tark wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:49 pmAgreed. Maybe it’s payback for bountygate.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:32 pm
It is funny because the Saints fans aren't even complaining about it.
I am shocked the NFL had the good sense to not review that play. Should have been called on the field, but since it wasn't, taking away that TD would have been the worst thing the NFL could have done.
Sadly not. One stellar performance out of twenty chances won’t do it for most. String together three more big wins this season might.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:44 pmThey probably sound disgusted because they all look like idiots for saying the saints will win by 100. I’ve been following the game all week like most of us have. I have not seen one single person predict the Vikings to win (other than on here)40for60 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:35 pm Harrison and Dungy looked and sounded disgusted like it was as bad as the Rams-Saints game last year. Can't believe it. Harrison is usually anti-Vikings and Cousins (the throw to Thielen was all him and no credit to Kirk) but Dungy is usually pro-Vikings. Why is there always something where the Vikings can't get credit for an awesome game? They slowed the replay way down - see how the defensive back's head goes back? Well, he was looking up at the ball morons... C![]()
ould it have been called? Maybe but that would have been very weak. Recalled? No.
I said all week I had a weird feeling about this game and that we play so much better when we’re viewed as underdogs. I called 27-24 Vikings but 26-20 sounds way better.
Maybe this will finally put the Kirk cousins and big game narrative to an end. Because that was by FAR the biggest game of his career and he couldn’t have played better on that final OT drive
I am pretty tired of both of their whining. The OC shouldn't change the calls because Diggsy isn't getting his spotlight. And Rhodes "oh look I got an owey" or pointing fingers at his team mates when things don't happen his way gets real thin. Just play your game, and when things go well (which they probably will in time) we will all say "Dang, glad he is in purple".Purple Domination wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:48 pm
Speaking of Diggs melt down. I wasn’t a fan of Rhodes melt down and apparent blame game with Harry and others.
I'm assuming Seattle because the Vikings were the last seed.Fran the Man wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 8:00 pm If Seattle beats GB next weekend and we beat the niners, where would the Seattle/Viking game be played?
I'm confident that they'd have made the field goal so their protesting the TD is a moot point. There was some contact but the fact that they didn't review and flag Rudy tells me that my observations aren't too far off for being just a fan.4mnvikings82 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:23 pm Media is already saying it should have been offencive interference. Just can't give us any props for a good win