Duuuuuuuuuude, you? Oh no, not you.Mothman wrote:Packers 45, Vikings 6.
We're toast.

Moderator: Moderators
Duuuuuuuuuude, you? Oh no, not you.Mothman wrote:Packers 45, Vikings 6.
Valhalla wrote:If Ponder starts, think there is a chance you could see players rallying to him.
In starting Freeman, the locker-room, Ponder, Cassel, just had to go along with it and be good soldiers, there time could come along. What would not have been good for them would be to be critical of Freeman and the decision to play him.
I agree with both of you. They should rally to Ponder...it's his team, regardless of how bad you think he's been.Texas Vike wrote:
I agree. For all the absurdity of the latest news, I have to admit that I'm looking forward to seeing how Ponder responds with his back against the wall. It would be pretty dramatic if he could defeat our arch-rival on Primetime TV. If he resurrects his career w/ a win look for Freeman's concussion to mysteriously become complicated and protracted.
He even looked disgusted on Monday Night. I bet he was thinking, "Holy crap? Is this what I look like out there?" And I bet a part of him was going, "HAHAHAHA, and you think I suck!?!" He'll never admit to that, though. But I gotta think he was a little naughty with his thoughts towards Vikings fans, like, "Is this what you wanted? Oh yeah? Good luck to ya!" You know it's bad when we're excited to see what Ponder can do. LOL.Texas Vike wrote:
I agree. For all the absurdity of the latest news, I have to admit that I'm looking forward to seeing how Ponder responds with his back against the wall. It would be pretty dramatic if he could defeat our arch-rival on Primetime TV. If he resurrects his career w/ a win look for Freeman's concussion to mysteriously become complicated and protracted.
I think he's always been our best shot, we just didn't know it. But going from like a 10% chance to win to a 12% chance isn't very significant.radar55 wrote:With Ponder now at Q/B I need to change my previous score from 48 - 0. I still believe it will be a blowout, something in the range of 34 - 10 but has it really come to this......PONDER is now our best chance against GB. Who would have believed it
This is more like a horror movie.Valhalla wrote:Just to add on, vs. being a circus, this thing is more of a soap opera to me.
mondry wrote: I think he's always been our best shot, we just didn't know it. But going from like a 10% chance to win to a 12% chance isn't very significant.
radar55 wrote:With Ponder now at Q/B I need to change my previous score from 48 - 0. I still believe it will be a blowout, something in the range of 34 - 10 but has it really come to this......PONDER is now our best chance against GB. Who would have believed it
I love your new Ponder pic, it's like, "I'm baaaaaaack!"JEC334 wrote: This is more like a horror movie.
I jump the bid to 19% on Ponder!Just Me wrote: I still think Cassel is our best shot to win. (up to 13% chance to win!)
Mothman wrote: I jump the bid to 19% on Ponder!
Wait, what are we doing again?
That still wont help their defence, Aaron Rodgers is going to be doing his wwe belt move a lot sunday night.Eli wrote:If the Vikings get the 1-good-game-out-of-5 Ponder on Sunday night, they could have a chance.
Yes!Orion wrote:Vikings 24
Packers 17
Heard it here first. Prepare to get shocked.