Really? I had the same question. I didn't know about that rule.me4get wrote: Can't intentionally take a delay of game under 2 minutes in the half.
Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- Contact:
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Offense is still too slow at the beginning of games, better in the second half.yezzir wrote:A terribly underwhelming 1st half leads to a very courageous and impressive 2nd half from the Vikes.
Impressed with Teddy today. 2 weeks in a row he rebounded and finished VERY strong. Good for him.
Viking fan since '65
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
that's the kind of win that can inspire hope! Our defense didn't have it's best outing today and the anemic offense finally got in stride and picked the defense out of a hole!
4-5 going into the bye, can't be too upset with that! Lets hope we can use this as a momentum builder and kick the Bears #### at soldier field where they have yet to win a game all year
4-5 going into the bye, can't be too upset with that! Lets hope we can use this as a momentum builder and kick the Bears #### at soldier field where they have yet to win a game all year


Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Glad to see the team as a whole put together a nice second half for the win. Some good momentum going into the bye with two tough wins 

Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Teddy outplayed RGIII today. Both in stats and clutch plays.
It is pretty clear that if Teddy gets a little time he can be awesome.
It is pretty clear that if Teddy gets a little time he can be awesome.
Last edited by TSonn on Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Really? I've never heard of that rule. (Which doesn't mean you're wrong.) Weird.me4get wrote: Can't intentionally take a delay of game under 2 minutes in the half.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:54 pm
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
How bitter is the Buffalo game? We could have a winning record. Sorry, hate to be the downer
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Nice win!
Teddy really looked solid from what I saw (started watching at 10-0 right when RG3 made his INT). Asiata was a beast! TEs looked solid too.
Teddy really looked solid from what I saw (started watching at 10-0 right when RG3 made his INT). Asiata was a beast! TEs looked solid too.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
what would the benefit of taking a delay of game penalty be in that instance anyways?PurpleMustReign wrote: Really? I had the same question. I didn't know about that rule.

-
- Franchise Player
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:29 am
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
I don't think that is correct.me4get wrote: Can't intentionally take a delay of game under 2 minutes in the half.
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
One less second and save the TO? Pretty minimal. Unless having 5 more yards to work with on the punt would help too.saint33 wrote:
what would the benefit of taking a delay of game penalty be in that instance anyways?
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Well, it took them a year and a half but the Vikes finally got back-to-back wins again! Well done. I love the resiliency they showed today after missing some big opportunities early. They took every punch the Redskins delivered and then punched back. It's a shame they couldn't quite close out that Buffalo game or they'd be at .500 right now. Still, the Bears have struggled lately so that's going to be a winnable game and I'll be there so they'd better win it. at 4-5, with 7 weeks left, this team can still get themselves into the playoff mix.
From what I saw and heard, Floyd was amazing today. He had a strong game last week too. Between him and Griffen, we may be seeing a dominant right side of the DL developing...
From what I saw and heard, Floyd was amazing today. He had a strong game last week too. Between him and Griffen, we may be seeing a dominant right side of the DL developing...
-
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- Contact:
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Give him more room to punt. With Locke, he could kick fro mthe other endzone and get a touch back, but the idea is to make it "harder" to get a touch back.saint33 wrote:what would the benefit of taking a delay of game penalty be in that instance anyways?
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
- Franchise Player
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:29 am
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Why save the TO at that point in the game by sacrificing field position? Really just not worth it.Texas Vike wrote: One less second and save the TO? Pretty minimal. Unless having 5 more yards to work with on the punt would help too.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 9
Idk, that's kinda reaching imo. The timeout at that point makes no difference. 1 second the same.Texas Vike wrote: One less second and save the TO? Pretty minimal. Unless having 5 more yards to work with on the punt would help too.
