Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:30 pm
Moxy.
I'm so encouraged right now. Both with the defense and Teddy.
I'm so encouraged right now. Both with the defense and Teddy.
Vikings Message Board.Com
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Page 29 of 42
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:30 pm
Very impressed with Teddy in the pocket. I think this guy has the goods.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:30 pm
Way to go, Teddy!!! Good job!
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:31 pm
The roughing call was correct. Can't German suplex QBs in the NFL.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:31 pm
he intentionally contacted a player in the back on a dead ball.liquid_mojo wrote: Have you been watching football the past few seasons? Understand I don't like the call, but i'm not clueless to how the game is called now days.
You expect a flag on Brees for pelvis thrusting a dude? It was a weak #### comeback from Brees and a QB won't ever draw that kind of a call, again...I have adapted my expectations for how calls will be made on prior precedents.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:31 pm
No flag? Ellison was wearing the guy when the ball got there.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:31 pm
VikingLord wrote:The roughing call was correct. Can't German suplex QBs in the NFL.
Nope. Frustrating none the less.
Wish they would call it both ways. That was early contact there.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:32 pm
I stopped arguing with you (hence why no quote). it's a forum where I'm allowed to voice opininon, if you could stop with your personalized attack, I'd appreciate it as it's against the rules. I get it, you like zebras and quarterbacks in dresses, enjoy.Purple Reign wrote: I guess you can argue all you want, it was a body slam IMO and the only person who really counts - the refs - also think so.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:32 pm
Would love to see the Vikes try something down the field.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:33 pm
TeddyB wrote:I get it, you like zebras and quarterbacks in dresses, enjoy.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:33 pm
Teddy is the goods. Through and through.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:34 pm
Where in the rule book does it say it's a penalty to contact a player in the back on a dead ball? I think you are making up rules.me4get wrote: he intentionally contacted a player in the back on a dead ball.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:34 pm
no pass INT?
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:34 pm
You expect a flag from a tackle where the QB's head wasn't touched? I get the slamming on the head, I get the hitting a QB in the head with your arms. None of that happened here. If you want to get so strict that it was a Penalty on Munnerlyn, it was one on brees as well.liquid_mojo wrote: Have you been watching football the past few seasons? Understand I don't like the call, but i'm not clueless to how the game is called now days.
You expect a flag on Brees for pelvis thrusting a dude? It was a weak #### comeback from Brees and a QB won't ever draw that kind of a call, again...I have adapted my expectations for how calls will be made on prior precedents.
Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:34 pm
You're kidding, right?Purple Reign wrote: Where in the rule book does it say it's a penalty to contact a player in the back on a dead ball? I think you are making up rules.