Vikings Message Board.Com

it is so unfair to go from favre to rodgers

greenway has always sucked covering. all his interceptions have been bad passes, tips, and luck, man he gets burned often

Hunter Morrow wrote:Packers are 9/10 on 3rd down, 138 yards and two touchdowns.

8-10.

Laserman wrote:greenway has always sucked covering. all his interceptions have been bad passes, tips, and luck, man he gets burned often

Following the receiver like a puppy dog

I swear, Greenway could not cover me. We sure like to overpay average guys.

Orion wrote:it is so unfair to go from favre to rodgers

It almost makes one think that there might be some coaching involved

Why is a Linebacker covering their only good receiver?

What is that a loofa? It's a kweeno.

HardcoreVikesFan wrote:Lol at the people who think Chad Greenway is still a 'pro-bowl' player.

Meh, there aren't many (any) linebackers who can match up with the opposing teams top WR and come out ahead. The safety messed up worse, Greenway gave up like a 8 yard catch but the safety took the bad angle and gave up the outside for the TD.

Purplemania wrote:You could give Ponder a million years and he would never ever be able to make that throw Rodgers just made.

Depressing as hell.

I agree. What hurts more? That we have to watch Ponder flounder or that we have to watch the Packer's QB zip passes within inches of our defending players' helmets for TDs?

because a good team makes a adjusements while the vikes are like

And more Ponder wimp ball?

Purplemania wrote: It was zone coverage.

Sendejo totally blew his deep coverage, too. Not just Greenway's fault.

We need to start eating Quinoas, and lots of 'em!

GB was way offsdide on the kickoff.