It's not that simplistic. One of the reasons Teddy didn't throw a TD in the first game was because he had no time to throw the freaking ball. Peterson had 18 rushing yards. Was that entirely Peterson's fault then?mosscarter wrote:i'm going to go out on a limb here, but i would venture to say i think the problem is just a tad bit more on the qb than the freaking wide receiver coach. are you serious with this discussion? i mean should the wide receiver's coach run the routes, catch the ball, and get across the goal line too? all i know is this, patterson played better with cassel and he can't produce anything if he isn't on the field. the truth is aside from peterson, our offense is a total mess from the top down and adding a few linemen isn't going do much of anything. it starts with turner and bridgewater both, and if the production isn't there this year both need to go. bridgewater couldn't throw for a single td in two full games against seattle, and yet many viking fans were mad at walsh. you have to be kidding me.
Via PFF recap:
That's not to say Teddy didn't play poorly; he did. But there were other factors contributing. It wasn't all him. And you can't really blame him for the second game. If Wilson didn't have the one fluke botched play he turned into a first down/TD because Captain couldn't wrap up he wouldn't have had a passing TD either. Their passing yard stats were nearly identical (146 vs. 142)The offensive line had a tough game, as all five starters finished with a negative pass block grade. G Brandon Fusco (-1.7) struggled the most in that regard, allowing a sack, a hit and two hurries en route to a team-low -2.6 pass block grade. T Matt Kalil (-2.5) finished with the lowest overall grade among them, as he allowed two hits and two hurries and was also beaten frequently in the run game. As a unit, the Vikings allowed three sacks, five hits and nine hurries. While nobody else on the offense was able to do anything really positive, the line deserves a lot of blame for poor play yesterday.