Vikings Message Board.Com

mossbutt wrote: Its colder than a mother in laws love

Its colder than frost on a champagne glass

SP1966 wrote: Are you 12 and/or blind?

you know nothing about football.

Boone sucks. Clemmons sucks, Long sucks, Fusco sucks. Berger is okay, though.

fiestavike wrote: you know nothing about football.

I know enough to see there is nothing to step up into, unless you want him to step up into a sack.

[quote="fiestavike"][/quote]

If you think Bradford is the problem, how do you think Shaun Hill would look in there with this OL?

Uglier than a christmas sweater

23 is a punk #### ####... dirty play.

team just looks awful today. As i've felt many times so far this season, the running game has got to get going if this teams wants to contend. I don't know if it means picking up one via free agency/ waivers, but a decent 3 down back is needed(and the pickings are slim), but it needs to be addressed nonetheless.

It would also be nice if the O-Line would block.

In any case, terrible loss of a very winnable game. It's not like Went wowed with his play. Turnovers killed us and we deserved to lose this one. Hopefully this team can bounce back and beat up on a lousy Beras team next week.

#SKOL

This season reminds of the year the Vikings started 6-0 and lost to a winless Giants team on Monday night in the Metrodome.

Yes, they have a decent defense. Yes, they have had some good fortune with turnovers. No, they can't pass or run block to save their lives.

It will be a nice season. They might even mange to win their division. But that will be the likely extent of it.

Classic Vikings.

Angels Wings wrote:team just looks awful today. As i've felt many times so far this season, the running game has got to get going if this teams wants to contend. I don't know if it means picking up one via free agency/ waivers, but a decent 3 down back is needed(and the pickings are slim), but it needs to be addressed nonetheless.

It would also be nice if the O-Line would block.

Without the second point none of the first makes #### for difference. The falls 100% on the lack of an O-line, nothing a different QB, RB, and WRs could do about it.

Well that was pretty

Only good thing, qb rating under 60 for Wentz

Look at those (low)hilights, there is a fracking party in Bradford's face on every last one of them.

soflavike wrote: Could be... it was a really inexplicable no-call, especially when 2 refs threw flags.

They didn't call one on Rhodes later in the game so it evened out.

Eagles were the better team and they kicked our butt. That's clear.

The OL was a horror show today. I'm thankful that Bradford didn't leave the game on a cart.

We are not the best team in the league. We are not in the top five, even. Too many major deficiencies on offense. A helluva defense will only get you so far.

Game ball to Asiata for never giving up and for playing hard. Honorable mention to Cordarrelle Patterson.