Yesterday, I tortured myself by listening to Colin Cowherd on Fox Sports Radio. He had some doofus on there doing "The Headline Before the Headline." Basically, it's a prediction segment using "creative" headlines before the games are played.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:26 pm I’m not gonna lie, I’m already sick of hearing the media blow up this packers team. They are acting like this defense is the next coming of the 85 bears. Yeah sure they played good week 1 but let’s be honest, trubisky was pathetic. And I don’t believe it was all because of that defense. I just don’t think trubisky is a good QB. I mean the Bears were 21st in total offense last year and were largely carried by their defense. It’s not like the packers just held the rams or chiefs to 3 points. It was the fricken bears.
No less I just about threw up when they gave Rodgers “player of the game” last week. He had 1 play that gained the majority of his yardage. He missed throws all night and threw a junk TD pass to jimmy graham. It disgusts me how much the media is obsessed with that team and Rodgers. They haven’t been relevant in a few years now and Zim is 5-1-1 against them since 2016.
In a way I’m glad we’re underdogs because we play better when that is the case.
My newborn son says 24-13 Vikes and I agree!
This idiot (can't remember his name), a so-called expert, picked the Packers to "win big." Check out his reasoning ... "I don't see how this Vikings team, which disappointed everyone last year at 8-7-1, can hang with Aaron Rodgers and Green Bay on the road."
Never mind that the Packers were 6-9-1 last year and 7-9 the year before. Somehow, that's immaterial, even though Erin played all 16 games last year.
My dream is that the Vikings not only win tomorrow, but embarrass Green Bay, much the way we did in 1998.