Page 3 of 3

Re: CP84 as a receiver...

Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:15 am
by DK Sweets
losperros wrote:
I see it the same way. What's more, I'm hoping that Bridgewater-to-Patterson becomes a Vikings trademark like Culppepper-to-Moss (or Carter) did. :thumbsup:
Perhaps even as prominent as the short lived McNabb-to-ground? We saw that for what felt like 10+ times per game. No receiver could defend it.

Re: CP84 as a receiver...

Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:32 am
by Crax
DKSweets wrote:Perhaps even as prominent as the short lived McNabb-to-ground? We saw that for what felt like 10+ times per game. No receiver could defend it.
Indeed. If done right, no can defend
Image

Re: CP84 as a receiver...

Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:07 pm
by losperros
DKSweets wrote:Perhaps

even as prominent as the short lived McNabb-to-ground? We saw that for what felt like 10+ times per game. No receiver could defend it.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Re: CP84 as a receiver...

Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:15 pm
by Mothman
"Daniel-san! Put that pass on the receiver's hands!

Good. Now show me... sand floor!"

I want Zimmer to spend a day making the Vikings paint fences, sand floors, wax cars, and so on and then show them they were really learning how to play football all along.

Re: CP84 as a receiver...

Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:16 pm
by PsyDanny
Mothman wrote:"Daniel-san! Put that pass on the receiver's hands!

Good. Now show me... sand floor!"

I want Zimmer to spend a day making the Vikings paint fences, sand floors, wax cars, and so on and then show them they were really learning how to play football all along.
Oh Oh Oh .... my house, my house!!