Adrianpeterson28mvp wrote:Understood haha I wasn't attacking your football knowledge. Just saying my wife could turn on the TV and say oh the Vikings won in a blow out and the Pats lost to Miami? Therefore Vikings will edge out the Patriots this week. You guys should know being Vikes fans that football is a week to week game and track records can't just be ignored. Yeah Robinson got a pick, things are changing so lets just ignore the past 10 years where our LBs can't cover RBs and Brady has been able to dissect our defense at will. Let's not forget Shaun Hill started 5/5 for against us today and people (myself included) were complaining. Not to take anything away from the W today at all though but next week is a new battle.
Sorry, but this argument makes no sense.
If every week is a new battle, and football is week-to-week, then why on earth do the past 10 years matter?
Ten years ago, Brady had totally different weapons, a different offensive line, a different defense playing with him. There isn't a single Viking on the team now who was on the team 10 years ago, nor is there a single coach. Heck, most of the team has turned over the past 5 years, and the Patriots have never been slaves to sentimentality -- they dump guys BEFORE they begin to decline.
All that really matters is what's going on THIS YEAR. But if you want to look back, how about last year, when Brady's Patriots put up exactly 6 points against Mike Zimmer's Bengal defense? Sure, the Bengals had better personnel than we have this year, but that's still a far more relevant comparison than what these two teams did in 2004.