Iron Man

Krulik · Post by **Krulik** » Tue May 06, 2008 2:56 am

I think the new Batmans are the class of the superhero movies today.

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 7:28 am

Demi wrote: I'm not artsy fartsy...I just enjoyed it as a good solid action movie!

Good solid action movie that was ruined by the worst last 20 minutes in the history of movie making.

wang_chi7 · Post by **wang_chi7** » Tue May 06, 2008 7:53 am

VikingMachine wrote: Good solid action movie that was ruined by the worst last 20 minutes in the history of movie making.

Just curious, what are some of your favorite movies?

Colinito · Post by **Colinito** » Tue May 06, 2008 9:11 am

wang_chi7 wrote: Just curious, what are some of your favorite movies?

Let me guess:

Live Free or Die Hard
2 Fast 2 Furious
anything by Michael Mann

TrenchGoon · Post by **TrenchGoon** » Tue May 06, 2008 10:11 am

Colinito wrote: Let me guess:

Live Free or Die Hard
2 Fast 2 Furious
anything by Michael Mann

You forgot about Face Off

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 10:13 am

TrenchGoon wrote: You forgot about Face Off

I expected in from the other poster, not you.

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 10:32 am

wang_chi7 wrote: Just curious, what are some of your favorite movies?

I guess I have never sat down and thought too much about it or made a list as some people do. Off the top of my head, some of my favorite movies are:
The Evil Dead - Evil Dead II and Army of Darkness
300
Gladiator
Pulp Fiction
National Lampoons Animal House
Oh Brother Where Art Thou
Tombstone
The Breakfast Club
Rocky
Major League
Predator
Cape Fear
Shaun of the Dead
Superbad
Old School
Rambo
Saw
Die Hard
Young Frankenstien
Wizard of Oz
Fargo
Full Metal Jacket
The Godfather
Scarface
Austin Powers
American Beauty
The Usual Suspects
Schindlers List
Reservoir Dogs
The Silence of the Lambs
This is Spinal Tap

This is but a partial list, I am sure there are some I missed.

BGM · Post by **BGM** » Tue May 06, 2008 10:59 am

I don't dig when people are asked to list their favorite movies in order to be judged by their preferences. We all watch movies for different reasons, and even those reasons change from day to day. One day I may be interested in seeing a well-crafted, technically brilliant movie, while the next day I want to see an intimate character study. Some days I am all about escapism and simple, slam-bang action, and other days I want to delve into something deeper.

Frankly, we all have films which we are proud to say we love, and others that we do love, but may not be eager to share with others. For example, I love the movie Sixteen Candles. I just do. I'm not proud of it, but there it is. And I thought Click was a good movie, and laughed heartily watching Billy Madison. Not exactly the pinnacle of filmmaking, but I liked them.

There is such an oversimplification when judging people based upon movies they like.

BGM

Minniman · Post by **Minniman** » Tue May 06, 2008 11:09 am

There is such an oversimplification when judging people based upon movies they like.

I can usually tell a lot from a moviegoer by how well they like or dislike Ridley Scott films like Alien, Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and Blade Runner. Peter Weir films like Master and Commander, Witness, and Gallipoli are similar.

I know friends and family that would fall asleep trying to watch many of those films. They want action or comedy at all times. That is fine for them, but I wouldn't take their film reviews seriously. I mean, Wild Hogs was fine, but it wouldn't win any awards in my book.

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 11:26 am

Minniman wrote: I can usually tell a lot from a moviegoer by how well they like or dislike Ridley Scott films like Alien, Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and Blade Runner. Peter Weir films like Master and Commander, Witness, and Gallipoli are similar.

I know friends and family that would fall asleep trying to watch many of those films. They want action or comedy at all times. That is fine for them, but I wouldn't take their film reviews seriously. I mean, Wild Hogs was fine, but it wouldn't win any awards in my book.

But is it all about winning awards?? Who cares if Wild Hogs would sit well or not with the "intellectuals" who over analyze movies. Wild Hogs is a great movie to take the family to. Its fun, its funny, it has a decent plot, tells a good story and even has a few lessons in it. We went to it as a family. My wife, 3 children and I all had a great time. IMO it was an award winning movie for its niche. Its not all about being cerebral....thats just a niche too, unfortunately thats pretty much the niche that gets the awards.

BGM · Post by **BGM** » Tue May 06, 2008 11:59 am

The one thing it is ok to judge by looking at movies is whether you would agree with that person's critique of a movie or not. If I talk with someone who I know loves movies that I do not care for, I have different expectations of their opinion of any movie than if I am talking to someone with whom I agree often on movies. That doesn't seem unreasonable.

There aren't awards given to movies just for being fun. No more so than we send football players to the Hall of Fame for being nice or personable. It has to do with technical achievements, technique, craftmanship. Not to say a movie cannot be fun and well crafted. I liked Cinderella Man because it was well-crafted and a joy to watch. I loved Batman Begins but do I think it s award-worthy? Not outside of technical achievement, IMO.

BGM

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 12:48 pm

BGM wrote:The one thing it is ok to judge by looking at movies is whether you would agree with that person's critique of a movie or not. If I talk with someone who I know loves movies that I do not care for, I have different expectations of their opinion of any movie than if I am talking to someone with whom I agree often on movies. That doesn't seem unreasonable.

There aren't awards given to movies just for being fun. No more so than we send football players to the Hall of Fame for being nice or personable. It has to do with technical achievements, technique, craftmanship. Not to say a movie cannot be fun and well crafted. I liked Cinderella Man because it was well-crafted and a joy to watch. I loved Batman Begins but do I think it s award-worthy? Not outside of technical achievement, IMO.

BGM

You are splitting hairs IMO.
Do we not give an award to for the best comedy of the year? Then why not an award for the best family film? I guess maybe for many films the "award " lies not in a shiny piece of metal given by many who IMO think they are smarter than they are but by the fact that tens of millions of people love the film and that it makes hundreds of millions of dollars.

Krulik · Post by **Krulik** » Tue May 06, 2008 12:56 pm

Well believe it or not, there is a difference between good, intelligent made films than well... the other stuff that is shiite.

VikingMachine · Post by **VikingMachine** » Tue May 06, 2008 12:59 pm

Krulik wrote:Well believe it or not, there is a difference between good, intelligent made films than well... the other stuff that is shiite.

Did you think that people here didnt understand that?

Post by **Cliff** » Tue May 06, 2008 1:06 pm

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.