Page 19 of 28

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:40 pm
by S197
RandyMoss84 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:28 pm I hope Mahomes chokes in the Superbowl, I can not stand the Chiefs and the fans
Ive been to Arrowhead a couple of times including this year’s game. Never had any issues other than very minor ribbing. I’d say one of the better fan bases for sure.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:02 pm
by RandyMoss84
S197 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:40 pm
RandyMoss84 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:28 pm I hope Mahomes chokes in the Superbowl, I can not stand the Chiefs and the fans
Ive been to Arrowhead a couple of times including this year’s game. Never had any issues other than very minor ribbing. I’d say one of the better fan bases for sure.
Really? I guess you got lucky, the fans there have been classless and one of them pour beer on me

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:12 pm
by Pondering Her Percy
VikingPaul73 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:36 pm
Mothman wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:11 pm

... and if they want that, they need a better o-line... here we are again.
Exactly and that’s the problem. Cousins isn’t good enough for his contact so they cannot build the dominant OL and running game that’s required to compensate for cousins’ limitations . They need to pay up for OL DL and everywhere else, and draft a QB early every 3 years . Hopefully you can find a qb on rookie contract that can play well and win a SB.

Two ways to win in this salary cap era of the nfl:

1. Find an elite QB and pay him. Hopefully he can take you to the promised land
2. Find a good or even average qb on rookie contract - dominant D and good O and young qb is good enough to win big

How not to win

1. Pay an average QB like an elite QB, and live in salary cap hell because you can’t afford your great players with that QB contract
Just curious but what “great players” can we not afford on this team?

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:26 pm
by Pondering Her Percy
S197 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 4:13 pm If you’re eating up $30M+ a year you’re not going to have a spectacular everything else. YOU need to be spectacular and Cousins is not that on a consistent basis. Look at the Titans, similar run first old school offense. You only need a guy like Tannehill for that type of offense, put the rest of your resources everywhere else.

It’s opportunity cost. It’s not about Kirk vs whoever else. It’s is he worth that contract in this offense. And I don’t think he is. You can find a QB that can run play action for much cheaper. His contract should be given to a guy that can extend plays, make clutch plays, and carry a team when needed. It’s not worth giving it to a statue pocket passer that’s inconsistent in clutch games. Let him play out the last year of that boat anchor contract then decide. The biggest mistake they can do is extend him or Zimmer right now.

The Vikings need to pick an identity and stick with it. If this is a run first, strong defense strategy then you simply don’t pay a QB that type of money unless he’s a guy like Wilson who can make do with a shoddy o-line.
Just my two cents but if the Vikings signed Ryan tannehill, let’s say last offseason and cousins didn’t exist, I’d have an AWFULLY hard time seeing any fan being ok with that. And I’m not sure how many “clutch plays”. Tannehill is making. He threw for under 100 yards in each of his first two playoff games. Henry is just so dominant that nobody can stop him. And the more I watched that titans team, the more I realized that I don’t think our run blocking is nearly as good as some think. I just think dalvin cook is that elusive. Derrick Henry is not elusive at all but has giant gaps that open for holes. We didn’t have that very often.

And as for the mobile QB argument. I mean, there are plenty of pocket passers in this league that are legitimate statues in the pocket and don’t extend plays. Brady, Brees, rivers, Ryan, Goff, Jimmy G, etc. But when you look at their successful years, did any of them have as bad of a pass blocking OL as cousins had this year? Not that I can remember. And they have all had huge contracts at one point or another.

And on a side note, Rodgers missed a wide open Allison on a 4 man rush and took a sack instead. Just saying.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:56 pm
by CharVike
Speaking of Rodgers he's not looking to good in this champ game. Big time pressure. He also fumbled. Pressure gets them all. He's shut out so far. It's only half time but I think he's done.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:59 pm
by Purple Domination
Well on the bright side, we looked better against SF than the Packers have so far. They can’t stop their run either. It appears we ran into a buzz saw last week.

I think our offseason focus should be improving the OL and getting younger on defense. I’m not ready to blow the whole thing up yet.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:02 pm
by J. Kapp 11
Purple Domination wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:59 pm Well on the bright side, we looked better against SF than the Packers have so far. They can’t stop their run either. It appears we ran into a buzz saw last week.

I think our offseason focus should be improving the OL and getting younger on defense. I’m not ready to blow the whole thing up yet.
You beat me to it. Man, the Niners are OBLITERATING the Pukers. At least we put up 10.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:08 pm
by Raz
Erin and the pukers are a hot mess the vikes looked better than this in the first half last week

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:10 pm
by Mothman
Purple Domination wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:59 pm Well on the bright side, we looked better against SF than the Packers have so far. They can’t stop their run either. It appears we ran into a buzz saw last week.

I think our offseason focus should be improving the OL and getting younger on defense. I’m not ready to blow the whole thing up yet.
I am... because otherwise we can just expect more of the same.

The Vikings need to become the damn buzzsaw.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:16 pm
by J. Kapp 11
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:26 pm
S197 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 4:13 pm If you’re eating up $30M+ a year you’re not going to have a spectacular everything else. YOU need to be spectacular and Cousins is not that on a consistent basis. Look at the Titans, similar run first old school offense. You only need a guy like Tannehill for that type of offense, put the rest of your resources everywhere else.

It’s opportunity cost. It’s not about Kirk vs whoever else. It’s is he worth that contract in this offense. And I don’t think he is. You can find a QB that can run play action for much cheaper. His contract should be given to a guy that can extend plays, make clutch plays, and carry a team when needed. It’s not worth giving it to a statue pocket passer that’s inconsistent in clutch games. Let him play out the last year of that boat anchor contract then decide. The biggest mistake they can do is extend him or Zimmer right now.

The Vikings need to pick an identity and stick with it. If this is a run first, strong defense strategy then you simply don’t pay a QB that type of money unless he’s a guy like Wilson who can make do with a shoddy o-line.
Just my two cents but if the Vikings signed Ryan tannehill, let’s say last offseason and cousins didn’t exist, I’d have an AWFULLY hard time seeing any fan being ok with that. And I’m not sure how many “clutch plays”. Tannehill is making. He threw for under 100 yards in each of his first two playoff games. Henry is just so dominant that nobody can stop him. And the more I watched that titans team, the more I realized that I don’t think our run blocking is nearly as good as some think. I just think dalvin cook is that elusive. Derrick Henry is not elusive at all but has giant gaps that open for holes. We didn’t have that very often.

And as for the mobile QB argument. I mean, there are plenty of pocket passers in this league that are legitimate statues in the pocket and don’t extend plays. Brady, Brees, rivers, Ryan, Goff, Jimmy G, etc. But when you look at their successful years, did any of them have as bad of a pass blocking OL as cousins had this year? Not that I can remember. And they have all had huge contracts at one point or another.

And on a side note, Rodgers missed a wide open Allison on a 4 man rush and took a sack instead. Just saying.
PHP, I've made two long posts about Cousins and the subject of mobility, and they're solid takes. He's not a statue, but he has no escapability. Not talking about designed rollouts ... he's good on those, great to his left. I'm talking about escaping pressure on a straight dropback. It's not all his fault, but it's the truth. It's something the Vikings have to account for. Yes, the line gives up too much pressure, but Kirk doesn't pick them up when they do fail.

And no, I wouldn't take Tannehill over Cousins.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:19 pm
by VikeFanInEagleLand
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 1:14 pm

No less the fact that Keenum had a much easier road especially given that our division that year was an absolute joke. But the two seasons were so drastically different it’s not even funny,
Our division was a joke this year too. The Packers were HUGE posers.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:22 pm
by VikeFanInEagleLand
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:26 pm

And as for the mobile QB argument. I mean, there are plenty of pocket passers in this league that are legitimate statues in the pocket and don’t extend plays. Brady, Brees, rivers, Ryan, Goff, Jimmy G, etc.
Brady is NOT a statue. Just because they aren't scrambling QB's doesn't mean they don't avoid pressure. All you have to do is take a side step or something, or move up a little. Cousins on the other hand is a true statue that rarely does that.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:41 pm
by Raz
The Vikings look slow diggs cook aren't too bad for speed the defense is down right geriatric minus Kendrick's and hunter Need improvement across the board

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:41 pm
by CharVike
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:12 pm
VikingPaul73 wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:36 pm

Exactly and that’s the problem. Cousins isn’t good enough for his contact so they cannot build the dominant OL and running game that’s required to compensate for cousins’ limitations . They need to pay up for OL DL and everywhere else, and draft a QB early every 3 years . Hopefully you can find a qb on rookie contract that can play well and win a SB.

Two ways to win in this salary cap era of the nfl:

1. Find an elite QB and pay him. Hopefully he can take you to the promised land
2. Find a good or even average qb on rookie contract - dominant D and good O and young qb is good enough to win big

How not to win

1. Pay an average QB like an elite QB, and live in salary cap hell because you can’t afford your great players with that QB contract
Just curious but what “great players” can we not afford on this team?
Well Jimmy G who I'm not impressed with at all takes a ton of CAP space not a rookie deal and I think he's about to take his team to a Super Bowl. Having a dominate defense helps also. I'm not talking our 2017 D who many think was dominate but a D like the 49ers put together this year. Ask Rodgers about there D. They made him crumble also. He even fumbled. Threw a pick also. That's playing D. It's not over yet because there is still time left. More TOs may come.

Re: 49ers Post Game

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:02 pm
by RandyMoss84
Here comes the crying Cowboys fans that 49ers are in the Superbowl trying for their 6th trophy :roll: