Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

HardcoreVikesFan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6652
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by HardcoreVikesFan »

PurpleMustReign wrote: Is there any other part that can spasm?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Any muscle in the human body is capable is spasming. Usually, when one hears about back spasms, the erector spinae muscle group becomes excessively tight - restricting one's ROM and causing pain. However, back spasm is a very ambiguous term - it can refer to any posterior muscle.
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

The best thing about the game, Teddy. It is nice to see a guy improve every weak. Even with all the drops, his stats are awesome. You can see him gaining confidence.

Tom Johnson continues to get better and better. His name is mentioned all the time. I dont think I have heard Floyd's or Joseph's name yet. Is Robison hurt again? People been making excuses for him for a few years, his times has past im afraid.

CP, Wallace, and kyle are invisible. Luckily CJ is as good as I expected. They may have to keep Theilen because, every once in a while, he runs a good route. Diggs shows such skill anytime he is on the field. Would be nice to see him take CP's spot on the roster. And Returning kicks.

Our LB's are looking pretty darn good. I havent thought that in a long time. Although, overall, I wasnt impressed with the D. Or the Oline. Did we have any rushing yards? AD is good, but even he needs some blocking. Someone had mentioned having Asiata as a FB. I love that idea. He can still be used for goaline and some screens.

Captain, Waynes, and Walsh are huge disappointments to me. Yeah, I can say say im worried about Waynes even after a few pre-season games. And yeah I didnt like the pick, or that he was chosen first overall, or that he was even the best CB in my eyes. I hope to god im wrong. I want a stud corner. Please please please, dont feel the need to remind me hes just a rookie or to remember how Rhodes was. Please.
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by 808vikingsfan »

S197 wrote:I like the way Teddy is seeing the field and going through progressions. When he rolled right and found McKinnon all the way over to his left seems to indicate he's seeing the whole field really well. I don't know which announcers you guys had but out here it was the Raiders. They were saying Rudolph was open on a seam route on the 2nd series but TB didn't see him. Couldn't see it on tv but maybe on coaches tape that some subscribe to has it. Otherwise I thought he did well other than a few throws that were behind the receiver early on.
I think we'll have to wait for coaches film. Can't see where Ford and his defender was (he motioned slot right) but from this pic, Rudolph did look open.

Image
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by 808vikingsfan »

Stock Market Report: Vikings vs. Raiders

some highlights of the article
Solid Investments:
Matt Asiata. Who is this guy catching passes out of the backfield and darting all over the place? Surely it can't be Matt "three yards and a cloud of nothing else" Asiata, can it? He had a better game catching the ball than half of the Vikings' wide receiving corps on Saturday.

Jeff Locke. At least one Vikings kicker is having a good preseason! All Locke does is pin opponents inside their own 20 yard line. Let's hope that Locke keeps kicking like this all year.


Junk Bonds:
Run blocking. Jerick McKinnon had nowhere to go for all but one of his carries. The team averaged only 2.7 yards per rush. Not even Adrian Peterson is going to get many yards behind the run blocking that was on display most of the night.

Cordarrelle Patterson. The bad interception that Hill threw seemed to be his fault. Patterson was pointing to his chest while walking off the field which means he probably ran the wrong route. He also didn't get to return any kickoffs, which seems like the only way he's going to make an impact at this rate.

Trae Waynes. No, I'm not calling him a bust by putting him in this section. And he did almost have an interception. Sadly, that one didn't really count because it was thrown by Christian Ponder and nearly picking off Christian Ponder can usually happen by accident. But overall he played pretty poorly again, even after getting less to do by the coaching staff this week. It sucks that the 11th overall pick is probably going to be a project this year.


Buy:
Finally seeing "The Bru's Brothers" in together at linebacker. Anthony Barr and Eric Kendricks have a chance to be the foundation of a very good linebacking corps in the coming years, so it was good to see them on the field together. (Especially in the nickel package!)


If anyone missed Everson and Brian dancing, here it is. (I can almost see a smile on Zimmer's face)
https://twitter.com/cjzero/status/63530 ... 01/video/1
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Mothman »

Cordarrelle Patterson. The bad interception that Hill threw seemed to be his fault. Patterson was pointing to his chest while walking off the field which means he probably ran the wrong route. He also didn't get to return any kickoffs, which seems like the only way he's going to make an impact at this rate.
:roll: I guess Eric Thompson missed the TD last week.
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by fiestavike »

Mothman wrote: :roll: I guess Eric Thompson missed the TD last week.
But barring injury, based on what he has shown, he isn't likely to get a ton of snaps as a receiver this season. I think that may have been Thompson's unwritten assumption.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Mothman »

fiestavike wrote: But barring injury, based on what he has shown, he isn't likely to get a ton of snaps as a receiver this season. I think that may have been Thompson's unwritten assumption.
Maybe... I read (or perhaps mis-read) it as another crack about Patterson since the media (pro and amateur) have been making them all summer.
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by fiestavike »

Mothman wrote:
Maybe... I read (or perhaps mis-read) it as another crack about Patterson since the media (pro and amateur) have been taking them all summer.
It could be. I know some of my opinions on Patterson have been taken that way.

As I've indicated, Patterson has immense potential but as of right now I think he has very little value to this team, in part because of the depth at WR in front of him.

I just don't think 1-2 kickoff returns per game...which is probably how many won't go out the back of the endzone, give Patterson the potential to make much impact this year. And we can say "27 yard return" but when the ball winds up at the 18 its a -2 yard return.

Also, I think Patterson not fitting well in this offense isn't entirely a knock on him. Every player has deficiencies but, Patterson's strengths would really be on display in Pittsburg or Carolina where they play a little more school yard style offense.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Mothman »

fiestavike wrote: It could be. I know some of my opinions on Patterson have been taken that way.

As I've indicated, Patterson has immense potential but as of right now I think he has very little value to this team, in part because of the depth at WR in front of him.

I just don't think 1-2 kickoff returns per game...which is probably how many won't go out the back of the endzone, give Patterson the potential to make much impact this year.
If he's healthy and the Vikings don't give him many more opportunities than that to make an impact this season, they should go looking for a new offensive coordinator for 2016 because that would be inexcusable. Seriously, if Turner proves to be that inflexible with his personnel and his depth chart, the Vikes can do better.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by dead_poet »

Have we discussed how not awful Kalil has looked so far? He was going up against a pretty good player on Saturday. I tried focusing on him (and Clemmings) as much as I could. Run blocking as a unit is struggling early.

Hasan's take: http://vikingsjournal.com/_/minnesota-v ... iders-r678

House's take: http://www.mnvikingscorner.com/2015/08/ ... l?spref=tw
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:Have we discussed how not awful Kalil has looked so far?
Strong praise! ;)

I think he's looked very good so far this preseason. He hasn't been dominant but if he plays at this level all season, that side of the line should be just fine.
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by fiestavike »

Mothman wrote: If he's healthy and the Vikings don't give him many more opportunities than that to make an impact this season, they should go looking for a new offensive coordinator for 2016 because that would be inexcusable. Seriously, if Turner proves to be that inflexible with his personnel and his depth chart, the Vikes can do better.
This is where we really disagree. Turner is among the 3-4 most valuable members of the Vikings organization IMO (FAR more valuable than Cordarelle Patterson will ever be). I don't think its inexcusable or inflexible to refrain from asking 10 other guys to change how they play in order to accommodate 1 guy who can't do his job. Everybody else can play within the system and be where they need to be. Putting a guy out there who can't do that is going to hurt the offense. Patterson is just a gadget player and a decoy right now. If they use him as more than that before he lives up to the minimum performance standard, THAT would be an error. This offense is starting to function like a machine. The back foot hits and the ball is out. If Patterson can't consistently be where he needs to be in order to accommodate that (and so far he can't) he has no business being on the field.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:The best thing about the game, Teddy. It is nice to see a guy improve every weak. Even with all the drops, his stats are awesome. You can see him gaining confidence.

Tom Johnson continues to get better and better. His name is mentioned all the time. I dont think I have heard Floyd's or Joseph's name yet. Is Robison hurt again? People been making excuses for him for a few years, his times has past im afraid.

CP, Wallace, and kyle are invisible. Luckily CJ is as good as I expected. They may have to keep Theilen because, every once in a while, he runs a good route. Diggs shows such skill anytime he is on the field. Would be nice to see him take CP's spot on the roster. And Returning kicks.

Our LB's are looking pretty darn good. I havent thought that in a long time. Although, overall, I wasnt impressed with the D. Or the Oline. Did we have any rushing yards? AD is good, but even he needs some blocking. Someone had mentioned having Asiata as a FB. I love that idea. He can still be used for goaline and some screens.

Captain, Waynes, and Walsh are huge disappointments to me. Yeah, I can say say im worried about Waynes even after a few pre-season games. And yeah I didnt like the pick, or that he was chosen first overall, or that he was even the best CB in my eyes. I hope to god im wrong. I want a stud corner. Please please please, dont feel the need to remind me hes just a rookie or to remember how Rhodes was. Please.
I really have no worries about Rudy or Wallace. Rudy has looked pretty good the last two games and Wallace is Wallace. I truly feel that Turner just hasnt opened the playbook enough to say so this preseason. You don't see Teddy stretching the field a lot and Wallace and CJ (excluding this game) have been non-existent all preseason. I think that is due to Turner not wanting to reveal a lot in the preseason.

I've heard Floyd and Joseph's name a few times. They aren't getting enough playing time to say so right now.

As for our LBs, I agree they have looked very good. The thing with out LBs is we have very good depth now. If Kendricks gets the nod, you have Cole behind him, along with Hodges who can play any of the spots and I'm starting to really like Peters. Kind of reminds me of Cole. A guy that wasn't expected to make the team but is making a lot of plays in the preseason that could give him a chance.

I'm not sure what went on with Walsh. I need to see Captain more in the regular season to judge him. I feel like he will have a better year now that he knows the defense better. As for Waynes, I'm still not worried at all. They say it is the hardest position to adjust to in the NFL and he has only played in 3 preseason games. I think it is way to early to get bent out of shape over him.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by PacificNorseWest »

MrPurplenGold wrote:I've got 5 concerns for this team going into 2015 based on the preseason games we've seen so far.


5. Injuries: seems like the injury bug is really biting the Vikings this year which could derail any hopes of the playoffs.
Injury bug?

I don't think that's the case at all. Injuries happen and outside Loadholt, nobody crucial is gone for the year. Look at the Packers. Jordy gone for the year...Bears were counting on Marquess Wilson to step in with BMarsh leaving and Kevin White being out, but he went down too! It happens.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Preseason Week 3 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Oakland Raiders

Post by Mothman »

fiestavike wrote:This is where we really disagree. Turner is among the 3-4 most valuable members of the Vikings organization IMO (FAR more valuable than Cordarelle Patterson will ever be). I don't think its inexcusable or inflexible to refrain from asking 10 other guys to change how they play in order to accommodate 1 guy who can't do his job.


I'm not suggesting anything of the kind. I'm simply unwilling to view the situation as that extreme and I that seems to be where we disagree. Patterson's not incompetent. It's an exaggeration to say he can't do his job with the underlying implication that he can't do it at all. There's no reason he should be limited to nothing but kickoff returns this season and using him in the offense isn't a question of "asking 10 other guys to change how they play". It's simply a matter of incorporating what he does well and I doubt that would even require changing the playbook.
Post Reply