Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 9:26 pm
[quote="808vikingsfan"][quote="DK Sweets"]Don't get me wrong, he'd have better numbers than Teddy did, but he's not getting the 4,000 yards, 40 TDs, and 65% completion rate he's become accustomed to.[/quote]
Sorry to go off topic again but I just wanted to add this.
If Rodgers was greatly impacted by losing one WR (jordy), you can imagine what poor pass protection, poor run blocking, new receivers, and a new offensive philosophy would do to him.[/quote]
Rodgers dip in production was on account of WRs that couldnt win at the line, a non existant running game, and him simply being off.
He had a terrible O line, and no running game for his first 4 years as a starter. Not sure what your point is on tgis post, but just was pointing a couple things out for the purpose of clarity.
Sorry to go off topic again but I just wanted to add this.
If Rodgers was greatly impacted by losing one WR (jordy), you can imagine what poor pass protection, poor run blocking, new receivers, and a new offensive philosophy would do to him.[/quote]
Rodgers dip in production was on account of WRs that couldnt win at the line, a non existant running game, and him simply being off.
He had a terrible O line, and no running game for his first 4 years as a starter. Not sure what your point is on tgis post, but just was pointing a couple things out for the purpose of clarity.