Vikings Message Board.Com

TSonn wrote:Locke and Diggs looked good in the first half. The rest of the team was better off staying in MN.

Rudolph and Hill have been fine, and so has the pass protection. The run protection is nonexistent and something is wrong with Walsh. I don't know tha tI have ever seen a kicker miss FGs that badly on consecutive plays like that.

Dead_poet, are there any FA kickers out there? Did Gould sign with anyone?

Walsh is mentally through. Done with a fork in him.

Is Gould still out there? Hope Rick has his number.
They aren't even close misses.

soflavike wrote:Hill is doing a good job within his limitations.

Your right. Hill can't be blamed...he's doing as well as Shaun Hill could do, I'm just not sure we have a QB on the roster capabe of making the plays to actually win games this year. It will take a better effort from the team around him in order to even be competitive.

soflavike wrote:Spielman is on the phone with Robbie Gould right now.

He better be. Keep Walsh for KO's and have Gould do the FGs. Jesus H. I guarantee I could have been closer than those last two FG attempts.

If our offense looks like this with multiple quarterbacks under Turner, isn't it more likely that it's one of the other constants (Turner, AD) in the offense instead of Teddy? I lean more to Turner but his old teams never looked this bad so maaayyybe it's AD? Last time I suggested that I almost got banned, though.

soflavike wrote:Spielman is on the phone with Robbie Gould right now.

He better be..........AHHHHHH

Shurmur is patting Norv on the back saying good job.

It should be a tie game. But we're down 10.

What the #### was that last fg attempt? Two chances with the time out called and both go way far left. Was he even trying to make it? The ball didn't even land in the same zip code as the uprights.

Wow. Hate the Packers but that was an amazing throw by Rodgers.

TSonn wrote:If our offense looks like this with multiple quarterbacks under Turner, isn't it more likely that it's one of the other constants (Turner, AD) in the offense instead of Teddy? I lean more to Turner but his old teams never looked this bad so maaayyybe it's AD? Last time I suggested that I almost got banned, though.

Shaun Hill is a backup quarterback.

SF the sequel.....

autobon7 wrote:SF the sequel.....

honestly, it isn't nearly that bad...but its bad.