Re: The positives
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:35 am
This is funny to read because the radio announcers kept saying how Freeman had happy feet when the pocket was holding up for him. I can only assume someone is blind, just not sure who.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
Freeman was stepping up and making throws in the pocket when it was collapsing around him. I didn't see him bail on the pocket at all when it was formed and he extended quite a few plays by making lateral moves when the pocket did fail (but always looking downfield). Ponder would have "tucked and ran" on many of the passes Freeman threw.Webbfann wrote:This is funny to read because the radio announcers kept saying how Freeman had happy feet when the pocket was holding up for him. I can only assume someone is blind, just not sure who.
I saw the thread, and decided I would post on this point, even though I thought you all would think I was crazy. I saw the same thing. I liked Freeman's pocket presence. He moved around the pocket in a way that Ponder and Cassel don't. He seemed to have a good feel for where pressure was coming from. The season is pretty well lost, so I'm happy (more or less) to see if he can get in sync with the receiving corps.AADPFan wrote:I didnt read the thread, so not sure if this has been discussed yet, but i am suprised that more people are not clammering about this.
But my big positive was watching Josh Freemans pocket presence, and his poise under pressure behind our porous O-line, he was contantly looking down field when on the move, thats a lot more than can be said about Ponder. Many of his passes were not even close, however a lot of them were right on target but a bit to high (and a bit to hard). I beleive that given some time to practice together Freeman and our receivers can get on the same page and perform. Even after last night i still beleive that Freeman has bigger up side than our other QBs.
He's gotta watch out for those sneaky concussions....John_Viveiros wrote: I saw the thread, and decided I would post on this point, even though I thought you all would think I was crazy. I saw the same thing. I liked Freeman's pocket presence. He moved around the pocket in a way that Ponder and Cassel don't. He seemed to have a good feel for where pressure was coming from. The season is pretty well lost, so I'm happy (more or less) to see if he can get in sync with the receiving corps.
Yeah I was impressed by that too. I thought his pocket work was Big Ben like. Slipping out of sacks, escapability, keeping plays alive, and constantly keeping his eyes down field. The receivers clearly weren't used to that type of play. You could see them give up after a short time before realizing plays were still alive and the QB wasn't taking off to run. On some scrambles I even seen the receivers go into block mode not realizing Freeman was actually still looking to pass lol.AADPFan wrote:I didnt read the thread, so not sure if this has been discussed yet, but i am suprised that more people are not clammering about this.
But my big positive was watching Josh Freemans pocket presence, and his poise under pressure behind our porous O-line, he was contantly looking down field when on the move, thats a lot more than can be said about Ponder. Many of his passes were not even close, however a lot of them were right on target but a bit to high (and a bit to hard). I beleive that given some time to practice together Freeman and our receivers can get on the same page and perform. Even after last night i still beleive that Freeman has bigger up side than our other QBs.
Ha! You know it's a bad year when the words "NFL" and "football" replace "Vikings" in most statements lol. But I agree, I love watching football even if the Vikings suck. Football season is way too short.MelanieMFunk wrote:The biggest positive for me is: at the end of the day I'm still a big fan of the NFL.
I picked a 49ers vs Broncos Superbowl, but now I think I'd like to see a Seahawks vs Broncos bowl. That defense vs that offense would be an epic chess match.MelanieMFunk wrote:Looks like I'm going to have to go all in on Peyton and the Broncos.
I keep waiting for the wheels to come off in KC, but they keep finding a way to win. Even if they go 3-6 in the final 9 games they'll still finish 10-6 and probably end up a wildcard team. And because they play in the same division as Denver I believe they're going to be a wildcard team even if they go 12-4. Pretty sad considering 8-8 will win the NFC East lol.MelanieMFunk wrote:If that doesn't work, I'll go for the Chiefs. That team gives me hope! (See what can happen in such a short time with the right coaches, QB, and players who believe? There's hope for a better tomorrow!)
You forgot the Cowboys. You can't call yourself a Viking fan without hating the Cowpies. Crazy how nobody hates the Lions though. With them it's more like pity even though they're a division rival.MelanieMFunk wrote:And if THAT doesn't work out...anyone but the Packers, Bears, and Saints.
He threw this one 50+ yards in the air... to Harvin.Reignman wrote:But I'd like to point out all those TD passes to Harvin were short passes with lots of RAC yards. Ponder has still not thrown a long TD pass into the EZ in his career.