Page 2 of 3
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:22 am
by StanM
CharVike wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 4:11 pm
StanM wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:07 am
There was a recent article that grouped the Vikings roster by performance at all positions. It made the points that no team has an all pro bowl caliber roster and that the bottom third of our roster needs an upgrade. I see some people these recent less than spectacular moves as an attempt to raise the talent level or to use another term “depth”.
I see a calculated process that is going to take more than one season to complete. It appears that our new hires agreed to come in here and take one more shot with aging veterans before phasing out more of the aging players. I am an original Vikings fan of 60 years and have seen long stretches of needs at whole position groups that lasted for years. I’m liking the way they’re not blowing this up totally but rather phasing out and replacing players. I suspect the strategy of tanking doesn’t fit the Wilf’s commitment to keep a competitive team on the field year in and year out. I can understand that approach and some teams have used it to create dynasties. The thing is nowadays is that free agency and quick rebuilds have been successful in some cases. At the end of the day the Vikings have never listened to my opinions and my only involvement is whether I continue to follow them.
Everybody knows there isn't a team with a bunch of all pros. Tanking gets you nothing unless you know how to draft. Of course if there is an Andrew Luck prospect then you don't even need to know how to draft. Suck for luck. All a fan has to do is look at our last X number of years drafting and you know what the roster is. Off the top of my head Speilman missed on a few CBs and so our secondary sucks and we need to find players. Bradbury sucks because Speilman has never shown the ability to select all pro lineman and I don't need some grade because I have seen him play and get pushed all over the place and laid out flat on his back. He can't hold the point. That's a bum at the NFL level. Yes he is a great college player. There's only about 1700 total players. There's about 13,000 college players. Do the math. Very few make it. But there are different performance levels at the pro level. Fans call Cousins a bum or stiff or loser or non competitor and that's OK it's there opinion. But he certainly is much better than a guy throwing a ball in his back yard like me. He's certainly better than Kyle Sloter who made it to the pro level but sucks at that level. Free agency has been around a long time. IMO teams don't let all the guys they develop who are good pros hit FA. They keep them. Of course someone else may have a different opinion.
Salary cap hit, performance, injuries and roster depth all have to fit with their current team. Otherwise they will allow them to test the market. By my way of thinking I retired from an office career and don’t care to relive the experience. I let the Vikings do what they will and decide how much attention I will pay to them. I haven’t sat glued in front of the TV for the whole 60 years they have been here. Some years they sucked so bad that I was out mowing the lawn by half time.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:17 am
by StumpHunter
The contract details are out for Reed and between his and Davis' contracts, I don't understand why the Vikings didn't just keep the far superior Mason Cole.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 2:46 pm
by VikingsVictorious
J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 1:42 pm
Maelstrom88 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:52 am
The question isn't whether or not he can succeed vs. a DT at Grambling State it's whether he can block the average starting DT in the NFL. The answer is not very well. So in that regard yes he is a bum and a JAG. However, he is better than what we had and the draft will still present the opportunity to bring in real upgrades. This board needs to stop acting like a player is good just because he plays in the NFL. The answer is they WERE good as college players but are they good compared to their peers NOW? Not whether they can block me or you but whether they can block professional DTs on a consistent basis.
You guys are unbelievable. You automatically assume Chris Reed is worthless before you’ve ever seen him play a down for this team, even though you’ve never seen him play a down for any team.
Again, Chris Reed is ranked 36th out of 88 qualified guards in the NFL. That IS against NFL tackles, not Grambling State. Given that there are 32 teams who each need two starting guards, I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that makes him more than a bum. Is he the second coming of Steve Hutchinson? I’ve never seen him play either, but most indicators point to the answer being “no.” Is he better than what we had? Those same indicators say “yes.”
Some of you need to come to grips with the idea that roster management for the 2022 Vikings is not gonna to go down the way you would do it.
Great posts on this topic Kapp. I don't see why some are having trouble understanding what you are saying.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 2:49 pm
by VikingsVictorious
CharVike wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 4:11 pm
StanM wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:07 am
There was a recent article that grouped the Vikings roster by performance at all positions. It made the points that no team has an all pro bowl caliber roster and that the bottom third of our roster needs an upgrade. I see some people these recent less than spectacular moves as an attempt to raise the talent level or to use another term “depth”.
I see a calculated process that is going to take more than one season to complete. It appears that our new hires agreed to come in here and take one more shot with aging veterans before phasing out more of the aging players. I am an original Vikings fan of 60 years and have seen long stretches of needs at whole position groups that lasted for years. I’m liking the way they’re not blowing this up totally but rather phasing out and replacing players. I suspect the strategy of tanking doesn’t fit the Wilf’s commitment to keep a competitive team on the field year in and year out. I can understand that approach and some teams have used it to create dynasties. The thing is nowadays is that free agency and quick rebuilds have been successful in some cases. At the end of the day the Vikings have never listened to my opinions and my only involvement is whether I continue to follow them.
Everybody knows there isn't a team with a bunch of all pros. Tanking gets you nothing unless you know how to draft. Of course if there is an Andrew Luck prospect then you don't even need to know how to draft. Suck for luck. All a fan has to do is look at our last X number of years drafting and you know what the roster is. Off the top of my head Speilman missed on a few CBs and so our secondary sucks and we need to find players. Bradbury sucks because Speilman has never shown the ability to select all pro lineman and I don't need some grade because I have seen him play and get pushed all over the place and laid out flat on his back. He can't hold the point. That's a bum at the NFL level. Yes he is a great college player. There's only about 1700 total players. There's about 13,000 college players. Do the math. Very few make it. But there are different performance levels at the pro level. Fans call Cousins a bum or stiff or loser or non competitor and that's OK it's there opinion. But he certainly is much better than a guy throwing a ball in his back yard like me. He's certainly better than Kyle Sloter who made it to the pro level but sucks at that level. Free agency has been around a long time.
IMO teams don't let all the guys they develop who are good pros hit FA. They keep them. Of course someone else may have a different opinion.
They try to keep their best players. There's no guarantee they can do that. They'd like to keep there good players like Reed, but that can also be difficult to do.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:17 pm
by makila
Reggie White was just not very good. Eagles would have kept him.
*troll face*
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:50 am
by CharVike
makila wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:17 pm
Reggie White was just not very good. Eagles would have kept him.
*troll face*
Same could be said for Brady and Prime Time. There will always be a couple each year who are players above the normal FA castoff. For example Trea Waynes is your normal FA cast off. I'm sure another team signed him but he's not a good football player. If a guy is good then the cost will be through the roof in FA because there will be other bidders at the auction so get ready to screw your cap up. The Eagles owner at the time didn't want to pay Reggie the money he wanted so he signed a big deal with the Packers. Even before our guy Kirk players were looking to make as much as they could and would follow the advice of their agent. The minister of defense wanted the money also. I don't blame him either. Get it while you can.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 9:28 am
by StumpHunter
CharVike wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:50 am
makila wrote: ↑Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:17 pm
Reggie White was just not very good. Eagles would have kept him.
*troll face*
Same could be said for Brady and Prime Time. There will always be a couple each year who are players above the normal FA castoff. For example Trea Waynes is your normal FA cast off. I'm sure another team signed him but he's not a good football player. If a guy is good then the cost will be through the roof in FA because there will be other bidders at the auction so get ready to screw your cap up. The Eagles owner at the time didn't want to pay Reggie the money he wanted so he signed a big deal with the Packers. Even before our guy Kirk players were looking to make as much as they could and would follow the advice of their agent. The minister of defense wanted the money also. I don't blame him either. Get it while you can.
The Bengals went from the 20th best scoring defense to the 7th and going to the SB due mostly to free agent signings like Hendrickson, Awuzie and Hilton. The Packers went from 6 wins to the NFCCG with the additions of Amos, Smith and Smith. That is just off the top of my head, but I am sure there have been a lot more.
There are a lot of good free agents out there besides just Brady and Reggie White.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 11:18 am
by VikingsVictorious
StumpHunter wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 9:28 am
CharVike wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:50 am
Same could be said for Brady and Prime Time. There will always be a couple each year who are players above the normal FA castoff. For example Trea Waynes is your normal FA cast off. I'm sure another team signed him but he's not a good football player. If a guy is good then the cost will be through the roof in FA because there will be other bidders at the auction so get ready to screw your cap up. The Eagles owner at the time didn't want to pay Reggie the money he wanted so he signed a big deal with the Packers. Even before our guy Kirk players were looking to make as much as they could and would follow the advice of their agent. The minister of defense wanted the money also. I don't blame him either. Get it while you can.
The Bengals went from the 20th best scoring defense to the 7th and going to the SB due mostly to free agent signings like Hendrickson, Awuzie and Hilton. The Packers went from 6 wins to the NFCCG with the additions of Amos, Smith and Smith. That is just off the top of my head, but I am sure there have been a lot more.
There are a lot of good free agents out there besides just Brady and Reggie White.
I'm expecting Chris Reed to be one of them. Hope I'm right.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 11:22 am
by CharVike
StumpHunter wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 9:28 am
CharVike wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:50 am
Same could be said for Brady and Prime Time. There will always be a couple each year who are players above the normal FA castoff. For example Trea Waynes is your normal FA cast off. I'm sure another team signed him but he's not a good football player. If a guy is good then the cost will be through the roof in FA because there will be other bidders at the auction so get ready to screw your cap up. The Eagles owner at the time didn't want to pay Reggie the money he wanted so he signed a big deal with the Packers. Even before our guy Kirk players were looking to make as much as they could and would follow the advice of their agent. The minister of defense wanted the money also. I don't blame him either. Get it while you can.
The Bengals went from the 20th best scoring defense to the 7th and going to the SB due mostly to free agent signings like Hendrickson, Awuzie and Hilton. The Packers went from 6 wins to the NFCCG with the additions of Amos, Smith and Smith. That is just off the top of my head, but I am sure there have been a lot more.
There are a lot of good free agents out there besides just Brady and Reggie White.
The post pointed out Reggie who's a HOFer. The Bengals defense played great in the playoffs and proved it by shutting out Mahomes in the 2nd half. Mahomes pulled a loser chock job but IMO his OL sucked again and so did he. It always works that way. We signed plenty of FA's like Michael "money for nothing" Pierce and the guy you think sucks Cousins. I guess getting Rodgers back from injury had nothing to do with the Packers it was all the FA signings? Rodgers missed a game this year and the FA signings did nothing but count their money and they got beat. We found that out ourselves last year when loser Kirk was told not to play and we couldn't score and took the beat down. Defense didn't care and didn't show up again.
Bottom line I never claimed there are only bums in FA. There are some good players but the cost will be extremely high because there will be very few and many bidders. See the OL guys the Pats dump into the FA pool as an example. Money for nothing Pierce signed back with the Ravens. Home too roost with more money in his pockets. He understands the value of millions also. He learned something from Kirk. To bad he didn't step up for us.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:32 pm
by StumpHunter
CharVike wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 11:22 am
Mahomes pulled a loser chock job but IMO his OL sucked again and so did he.
He threw 3 TDs, 275 yards and his Oline only gave up 6 pressures total in that game. Neither of those things are true, and neither are relevant to point being made.
I guess getting Rodgers back from injury had nothing to do with the Packers it was all the FA signings?
Absolutely nothing to do with it, since he played 16 games in 2018.

Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:43 pm
by makila
My post re white was an extreme example, and the person who pushed free agency, that just because they are a FA doesn't mean they are bad.
The comment I've read by charvike made in multiple places is that teams don't let their good players hit FA. That simply is not an accurate statement.
Sorry for derailing.
"Free agency has been around a long time. IMO teams don't let all the guys they develop who are good pros hit FA. They keep them. Of course someone else may have a different opinion."
It doesn't matter if it's your opinion. It happens. Teams develop good players. Player doesn't want to keep playing for team. Player becomes a FA. The team has no say in it once the their contract is up. The player does.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:16 am
by CharVike
makila wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:43 pm
My post re white was an extreme example, and the person who pushed free agency, that just because they are a FA doesn't mean they are bad.
The comment I've read by charvike made in multiple places is that teams don't let their good players hit FA. That simply is not an accurate statement.
Sorry for derailing.
"Free agency has been around a long time. IMO teams don't let all the guys they develop who are good pros hit FA. They keep them. Of course someone else may have a different opinion."
It doesn't matter if it's your opinion. It happens. Teams develop good players. Player doesn't want to keep playing for team. Player becomes a FA. The team has no say in it once the their contract is up. The player does.
I know your example using White was extreme he was a dominate player. The Eagles owner at the time let many high quality players leave. Like most if not all he wanted to keep his money. I never claimed that all FA's are bums. A perfect example is the Patriots they let a couple very good OL guys leave. I think their cap management philosophy also plays a role in their decisions. They must also draft well. Our QB was a FA and the feelings are all over the board regarding that signing. A team can keep a player with a tag. The Chiefs tagged Orlando Brown this year our QB was tagged twice in his career. Trae Waynes is back on the FA market. We signed PP again. I wouldn't call either one a shut down CB. PP was at some point but those days are gone for good and that's why he was booted into the FA pool. But since our drafting of the CB position has been terrible we had no choice but to sign a player.
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:19 am
by CharVike
StumpHunter wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:32 pm
CharVike wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 11:22 am
Mahomes pulled a loser chock job but IMO his OL sucked again and so did he.
He threw 3 TDs, 275 yards and his Oline only gave up 6 pressures total in that game. Neither of those things are true, and neither are relevant to point being made.
I guess getting Rodgers back from injury had nothing to do with the Packers it was all the FA signings?
Absolutely nothing to do with it, since he played 16 games in 2018.
We already went through this. I'm not reliving it. But I will say 3 TD passes in a game seems great to you even in a lose. Our does that only apply to certain players?
Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 10:13 am
by StumpHunter
CharVike wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:19 am
StumpHunter wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:32 pm
He threw 3 TDs, 275 yards and his Oline only gave up 6 pressures total in that game. Neither of those things are true, and neither are relevant to point being made.
Absolutely nothing to do with it, since he played 16 games in 2018.
We already went through this. I'm not reliving it.
If you don't want to relive it, why did you bring it up when it has nothing to do with the point being made.
But I will say 3 TD passes in a game seems great to you even in a lose. Our does that only apply to certain players?
It applies to a QB who's
worst seasons have his team in the AFCCG. Hope that helps.

Re: Vikings Sign Veteran Guard Chris Reed to Two-Year Deal
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2022 7:48 pm
by Pep2Moss
Does this new regime have any faith in Wyatt Davis? Seems like they pushed him to bubble roster player this off season.