Page 2 of 2
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 4:24 pm
by fiestavike
S197 wrote:
Even if he's not here next year and his production doesn't improve, he still might be good for a TD kick return or two. Or some solid field position. That can be a game changer and probably not what you would get out of a late round pick that would probably struggle to make the team.
His return abilities alone could sway a win or two and that alone makes him worth not taking anything you can get.
Or...he could get stripped again by Mason Crosby
That had to be a low moment for Cordarelle.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 7:04 pm
by purpletinted66
eh, why trade him again? the dude's all legs, just put the ball in his bread basket every once in a while and keep the cameras rolling: i dont see why he cannot be an effective weapon if not a predator in the overall offensive scheme. so he's a bit non-conformist, no biggy, he has given props to the team, and am not aware of one negative instance: I bet he would thrive on some more credit.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 9:56 am
by Hunter Morrow
6th is the absolute lowest. I'd be more up for a 5th for sure.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 10:09 am
by losperros
purpletinted66 wrote:eh, why trade him again? the dude's all legs, just put the ball in his bread basket every once in a while and keep the cameras rolling: i dont see why he cannot be an effective weapon if not a predator in the overall offensive scheme. so he's a bit non-conformist, no biggy, he has given props to the team, and am not aware of one negative instance: I bet he would thrive on some more credit.
Absolutely correct.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:57 am
by halfgiz
Seattle is probably looking for a receiver now. Could slick Rick work another Harvin deal?
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:52 am
by fiestavike
halfgiz wrote:Seattle is probably looking for a receiver now. Could slick Rick work another Harvin deal?
Seattle does like to trade 1st round picks! That would be amazing. I think he would work out better for them than Percy Harvin did.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 3:33 pm
by SP1966
The guy hasn't shown the desire to be great, or even good. He relies on his natural ability which isn't enough in the NFL... so honestly, I don't care, they could simply cut him and I wouldn't be bothered.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 10:57 am
by jackal
I didn't think of that. Lockette their returner just retired it would be great to dump him off, especially
for a decent conditional pick, to the Seachickens
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 8:46 pm
by Funkytown
jackal wrote:I didn't think of that. Lockette their returner just retired it would be great to dump him off, especially
for a decent conditional pick, to the Seachickens
I think you're thinking of Tyler Lockett. He's fine. It was Ricardo Lockette who had to retire.
Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 2:41 pm
by PurpleKoolaid
A 4th for CP84 wouldnt be bad, seeing as neither Norv nor Zimmer will let him play. But I bet they waste a lot of time on Der German, who can run 1 and a half routes. This still burns me.