Re: Vikings @ Broncos Gameday Discussion Thread -- Week 4
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 11:59 am
Blah, when was it changed to a 3:25 game? Guess the Bronco's have to be in every 'prime time' game, dont they?
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
It was always a 3:25 gamePurpleKoolaid wrote:Blah, when was it changed to a 3:25 game? Guess the Bronco's have to be in every 'prime time' game, dont they?
Accurate.dead_poet wrote: What I imagine "Packer country" to be:
Jordy? Confirmation?DK Sweets wrote: Accurate.
That sucks! You could always go to a bar?HardcoreVikesFan wrote:I am salty.
This will be the first game this season I will be able to watch at least 75% of the game and I cannot watch it because stupid #### Green Bay vs. San Fran is on TV instead of Denver vs. Minnesota. It is dumb as hell that I have to watch a team I hate vs. a #### team instead of good game between the team I love and a team who is 3-0.
Anyway, Skol Vikings. We are going to win. 21 to 17. Book it.
To be fair, failing a Bears game, what honestly would you consider to be the most sensible broadcast in the Chicago area?Mothman wrote: I'm ticked about that too. We're getting GB vs. SF here. Two of the last three league MVPs will be on the field in Denver in what should be a good game and CBS seems to think Chicago is "Packer country".
Looks more like Pittsburgh, if you ask me.dead_poet wrote: What I imagine "Packer country" to be:
I never understood my fellow Packers fans thing with brats, its probably the east coaster in me, but give me a hot dog, prefferably a chili cheese dog any day.fiestavike wrote: you could cook a lot of brats on that lava!
The most appealing match-up featuring an NFC North team and considering that the Vikes are 2-1, the Broncos are undefeated and Manning is still a ratings draw, I'd say that's Vikes vs. Broncos this week rather than GB vs. the 1-2 49ers, who have been blown out 2 weeks in a row.Jordysghost wrote:To be fair, failing a Bears game, what honestly would you consider to be the most sensible broadcast in the Chicago area?
... or Gary, IN.Jordysghost wrote:Looks more like Pittsburgh, if you ask me.
Yea, I feel that. If the 49ers had one more win it might be a little different, but you do make a very good point.Mothman wrote: The most appealing match-up featuring an NFC North team and considering that the Vikes are 2-1, the Broncos are undefeated and Manning is still a ratings draw, I'd say that's Vikes vs. Broncos this week rather than GB vs. the 1-2 49ers, who have been blown out 2 weeks in a row.
Jordysghost wrote: Yea, I feel that. If the 49ers had one more win it might be a little different, but you do make a very good point.
@christomasson: Adam Thielen starts for Charles Johnson at WR and Robert Blanton for Andrew Sendejo at SS
Both have big games..dead_poet wrote:
I don't know what to make if Thielen over Patterson but it's not good.PacificNorseWest wrote: Both have big games..