Re: Deflategate report is in: Brady "generally aware"
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 3:03 pm

A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://beta1.vikingsmessageboard.com/
This all seams reasonable and well thought out.Pseudo Everything wrote:That Wells Report is a goldmine of damning nuggets.
Patriots equipment man Jim McNally was known as "the deflator". Geeze ... what a awful nickname. No creativity at all.
Ryan Grigson, GM of the Colts, comes across like the ultimate whining weasel.
Brady's refusal to cooperate should be construed as a confession of guilt.
I think this is all kind of mickey mouse stuff but nevertheless here's the punishment I think Goodell should impose:
Six game suspension for Tom Brady. One game for instructing the equipment staff to manipulate the Pats balls and five games for being Tom Brady. C'mon. Squeaky clean image, supermodel wife, one of the greatest QBs of all time. How can anyone actually like that guy?
Leave The Deflator alone. His nickname is punishment enough. Plus what is he going to do ... tell Brady that he won't manipulate the balls? He's just a pawn in the Pats 'win at all costs' culture.
Give Robert Kraft option of forfeiting a 7th round draft pick or agreeing to never wear a suit and tie at a football game ever again (I've never seen the guy in anything but a suit and tie ... ever).
I don't know anything about you guys heating the ball last year, but what the Patriots did was slimy and cheap, pretty much the story of that franchise and their many cheating scandals.DK Sweets wrote:Why is this so much more egregious than when we were caught heating ball on our sideline last year? Either way you're breaking the rules by manipulating the football.
This has the horrible odor of jealousy.
You don't think there's a difference between heating balls on the sideline, and a guy going into the bathroom before the game and letting air out of the balls? Or a QB giving an equipment guys souvenirs and free stuff to make sure the balls have less air in them than they are suppose to?DK Sweets wrote:Why is this so much more egregious than when we were caught heating ball on our sideline last year? Either way you're breaking the rules by manipulating the football.
This has the horrible odor of jealousy.
No, I don't think there's a difference. Either way the teams are trying to gain an advantage by manipulating the conditions of the football. Anything else is superficial.Demi wrote:You don't think there's a difference between heating balls on the sideline, and a guy going into the bathroom before the game and letting air out of the balls? Or a QB giving an equipment guys souvenirs and free stuff to make sure the balls have less air in them than they are suppose to?
I think the fact that the Vikings and Panthers got told "Don't do that again" and the patriots got "DEFLATEGATE"* and months of discussion is just ridiculous. The Patriots were caught cheating before and are one of the least liked franchises in the NFL, so people are looking for reasons to justify their hate.And it's jealousy to call out someone for cheating?...He didn't just say "they're cheating" and nothing came of it. They DID cheat. So good teams should be allowed to cheat or...?
The Patriots aren't very liked?DK Sweets wrote:No, I don't think there's a difference. Either way the teams are trying to gain an advantage by manipulating the conditions of the football. Anything else is superficial.
I think the fact that the Vikings and Panthers got told "Don't do that again" and the patriots got "DEFLATEGATE"* and months of discussion is just ridiculous. The Patriots were caught cheating before and are one of the least liked franchises in the NFL, so people are looking for reasons to justify their hate.
*Side note: adding "gate" to the end of scandals is the dumbest thing ever. Going by that logic, Watergate was a huge scandal about water.
DK Sweets wrote:No, I don't think there's a difference. Either way the teams are trying to gain an advantage by manipulating the conditions of the football. Anything else is superficial.
Lulz. Thanks bruh. Can't be serious all the time.DK Sweets wrote: This all seams reasonable and well thought out.
You'll like this:DK Sweets wrote:*Side note: adding "gate" to the end of scandals is the dumbest thing ever. Going by that logic, Watergate was a huge scandal about water.
@AlbertBreer If footballs are messed with, then approved by the refs, that's one thing. If team/QB is doctoring them after approval, it's something else.