Page 2 of 2
Re: Walsh not satisfied
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:32 pm
by PurpleMustReign
dead_poet wrote:
Without out-kicking the punt coverage unit, of course. That's partially what drew the ire of Childress/Priefer with Kluwe for a few seasons. A big punt with less-than-desirable hang time gives the returner a whole lot of time/field to work with. One of the quickest ways to Priefer's doghouse is with line-drive 60-yarders. .
I went to Training Camp last Saturday, and this guy, if he licks like he did in Camp, will be a freakin awesome punter. His hang time is forever, and every time he kicked it, the ball landed on the 5 and bounced straight up.
I am so glad we got rid of one of the most overrated players the Vikings ever had (Kluwe).
Re: Walsh not satisfied
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:31 pm
by Mothman
PurpleMustReign wrote:I went to Training Camp last Saturday, and this guy, if he licks like he did in Camp...
Are you sure you went to
Vikings camp?
... will be a freakin awesome punter. His hang time is forever, and every time he kicked it, the ball landed on the 5 and bounced straight up.
Thanks for the info. It's especially good to hear that about the hang time on his punts.
Re: Walsh not satisfied
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:33 pm
by PacificNorseWest
That's great. Too funny.
Re: Walsh not satisfied
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:33 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Mothman wrote:
Are you sure you went to
Vikings camp?
Thanks for the info. It's especially good to hear that about the hang time on his punts.
LOL. Jeez Jim, you're so immature...
Re: Walsh not satisfied
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:52 pm
by The Breeze
Maybe it was band camp....i hear it gets crazy there.