Page 2 of 2
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:07 pm
by Purple bruise
[quote="mansquatch"]Reusse is crotchety as ever. I swear the MN sports reporting scene is all about being critical of the franchise and complaining about everything they do. The only time the Vikings will ever be flawless is when they got 16-0 and win a super bowl. Until then the reporters will be eternally waiting for the chickens to come home to roost.
Wow that sounds like many of the naysayers on this board
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:10 am
by headless_norseman
We basically traded Harvin for Jennings and Patterson, and Winfield for Xavier. And to top it all of, we started out by getting Floyd. Good thing Reusse is a moron.
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:07 am
by losperros
Jeffbleedspurple wrote:
mmmm!! Good trade
I agree. I actually think it was a good trade. Harvin should help Seattle and I think we got plenty of value in return, plus the Vikings WR corps may have gotten better in the process.
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:11 pm
by NextQuestion
When he talks it sounds like someone is gargling