Vintage Vikings

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Vintage Vikings

Post by Funkytown »

Reignman wrote:Interesting that they went with the road whites and purple pants in 62 and 64.
Not that we haven't had our chances, we're 0-4 in conference championships since moving indoors. However only 1 of those was played at the dome. We were 4-1 in CC's when we played outdoors. 3 of them at the met (3-0).

We've had better home field advantage indoors .642 (154-86-0) at the dome vs .622 (97-57-4) at the met. It's our road record that took a dive when we moved indoors .418 (100-139-0) on the road in the dome era vs .512 (77-73-5) on the road during the met era.
Thank you for posting these numbers. I always knew the indoor/outdoor stadium arguments were a little foolish. It is what it is. Assuming we were "better" because we played outdoors is kinda like the post hoc fallacy. There has to be better reasoning than that! The Vikes have a great home field advantage and should be able to get it done. Someday we will. Then we can put this "outdoor stadium" stuff to rest.
Image
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL

Re: Vintage Vikings

Post by Raptorman »

Reignman wrote:Interesting that they went with the road whites and purple pants in 62 and 64.
Not that we haven't had our chances, we're 0-4 in conference championships since moving indoors. However only 1 of those was played at the dome. We were 4-1 in CC's when we played outdoors. 3 of them at the met (3-0).

We've had better home field advantage indoors .642 (154-86-0) at the dome vs .622 (97-57-4) at the met. It's our road record that took a dive when we moved indoors .418 (100-139-0) on the road in the dome era vs .512 (77-73-5) on the road during the met era.
FWIW, Vikings road records including playoffs.

Code: Select all

Outside   75/125   .375
Inside     25/14   .641
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
BGM
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5948
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 11:39 am

Re: Vintage Vikings

Post by BGM »

Was Joe Kapp still with the team in 1970? I see Gary Cuozzo's name, but no Joe Kapp.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Vintage Vikings

Post by Eli »

BGM wrote:Was Joe Kapp still with the team in 1970? I see Gary Cuozzo's name, but no Joe Kapp.
No. Kapp's last game with the Vikings was the Super Bowl loss to K.C. in 1969-70. He had a contract dispute with the Vikings that offseason and they traded him to the Patriots. He played one year there.
Post Reply