Page 2 of 4

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:30 pm
by Funkytown
If I worked with a #### like him I'd punch him in his worthless face!
Nah. Punch him in the throat. It's better. lol. Boom! :banana2:

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 4:40 pm
by PurpleKoolaid
Demi wrote: And you'll have just as many rings as he ever will.

Locker room cancer. A grade A little brat. Deserved every ring he's never going to have. Quit on the team repeatedly. "Play when I want to play" is right. doesn't care about anything but himself. Go to locker room before game is even over? Aw just randy being randy. Stays behind and uses press conference to heap praise on opponent? Aw just randy being randy. If I worked with a #### like him I'd punch him in his worthless face!

Good riddance and keep that garbage as far away from this team as possible.
We need more locker room cancers then. You may wanna back up slowly away from the cliff dude.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:13 pm
by Demi
Serious talk? He's the dip #### that told this owner it was him or the coach. Yeah Zygi is really going to be able to talk to that. :lol:
We need more locker room cancers then.
Thank god you're not the GM. And our GMs keep moving these clowns out west where they can continue to not win super bowls, and rot teams from the inside out. Even the Pats didn't want that jack #### Moss back. Even when he got down on his hands and knees and begged.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:29 am
by Raptorman
Demi wrote:Serious talk? He's the dip #### that told this owner it was him or the coach. Yeah Zygi is really going to be able to talk to that. :lol:
Thank god you're not the GM. And our GMs keep moving these clowns out west where they can continue to not win super bowls, and rot teams from the inside out. Even the Pats didn't want that jack #### Moss back. Even when he got down on his hands and knees and begged.
Well you have to admit, he was right on "either him or the coach." I think if they had dumped Childress first Randy may have been ok. Maybe.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:01 am
by Mothman
Purplemania wrote:Have a serious talk with him. Sign him for cheap, no incentives. If he #### up, cut his ####, no losses there.
What's the point of signing him at all? At this stage of his career, the idea is little more than nostalgic. Moss doesn't have much left to offer. He has 56 catches over the past four years. He's barely an echo of the player he was in his prime. His production last year was comparable to that of Michael Jenkins, a player the vast majority of Vikings fans felt needed to be replaced. The Vikings will be much better served using that roster spot for a receiver who might actually be able to help them now and in the future. That's not Moss.

Regardless of Randy Moss' attitude, past transgressions, etc., he simply doesn't bring enough to the table to make it worthwhile for a rebuilding team like the Vikes to use a roster spot on him.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:58 am
by losperros
Signing Moss at this downward stage of his career is taking a reverse course from what the Vikings are trying to in rebuilding the team.

No more stopgaps, especially one that is a shell of his former self.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:00 pm
by allday1991
I would of rather had him for a bit under a million than Simpson for what we paid for him. Just not sold Simpson, his only good ability seems to be his ability to jump but that's also a bad thing for him because he is a super soft player and doesn't like taking hits.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:30 pm
by Purple bruise
allday1991 wrote:I would of rather had him for a bit under a million than Simpson for what we paid for him. Just not sold Simpson, his only good ability seems to be his ability to jump but that's also a bad thing for him because he is a super soft player and doesn't like taking hits.
Were did you get the idea that he is supersoft :confused: He was injured last year and now is healthy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN1SFA2UDOc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1M-0ra76tI

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:36 pm
by Demi
And Moss isn't a super soft player that doesn't like taking hits?
Who is falling apart physically and has been for about five years.
Who has zero upside and 100% downside.

At least Simpson is relatively young, and actually tries. Watching Moss out their half assing it for the 49ers was pathetic.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:39 pm
by hibbingviking
moss wants to retire a patriot

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 6:56 pm
by allday1991
Demi wrote:And Moss isn't a super soft player that doesn't like taking hits?
Who is falling apart physically and has been for about five years.
Who has zero upside and 100% downside.

At least Simpson is relatively young, and actually tries. Watching Moss out their half assing it for the 49ers was pathetic.
I completely agree, I just thought moss might have been cheaper :?: would have saved more cap space for Winfield who apparently is going to see the seahawks next week? I cant see their cap space being any better than ours though.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:18 pm
by Funkytown
I don't think Moss has too much to offer anymore, HOWEVER, he is still a red zone threat (Uuuuh, which we need), Vikings fans love him, and I would LOVE to see him get 1,000 receptions for his career--and I'd like to see him do that as a Viking. Will it happen? Doubtful. Can I wish? Yes. It's not about Moss "being the answer"; it's simply about Moss "being a role player." Oh. And I suppose it's about some selfish, "but I love Randy" reasons, too. lol

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:34 am
by Mothman
Purplemania wrote:I still think Moss can be a decent WR. Yes, it may be mainly for nostalgia's sake, but Moss can still run and jump some- plus for whatever reason when he's on the field defenses still play him with respect to the deep ball. That alone opens up the field for AD and our slot receivers.

:lol: The Jenkin's comparison is pretty harsh. Moss even at this age is still faster and better than Jenkins, not to mention age does nothing to a receivers hands.
LOL! It may sound harsh but their production last year was similar and that was easily Moss' most productive season in the last 4 years. I don't want to make much more than that of the comparison because I really just made it provide additional perspective.
I will accept that the Vikings couldn't use Moss anymore ONLY if they actually infused the team with young promising receivers. No more Aromashado - Burton - Jenkins - crap.
I don't want to see any more of that either... which is why I wouldn't want them to sign Moss because that's exactly what he would represent: mediocre production with no real upside for the future.

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:54 am
by allday1991
I think the comparisons between moss and Michael Jenkins are bit unfair also. Although product last year was similar moss had 12 less catches for the almost the same amount of yards and scored one more td and was targeted far less. Plus when would you ever see Michael Jenkins do this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T17WtJCqtw8

Re: we should sign moss

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:56 am
by Purple Domination
hibbingviking wrote:moss wants to retire a patriot
I figured this would be the case... Has he actually come out and said it?