Page 2 of 2
Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:34 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Hunter Morrow wrote:How can Joe Buck talk with Rodgers' nutsack in his mouth? I haven't heard ball washing this hardcore since every time Madden called a Favre game.
Joe Buck's announcing is basically gay pornography.
Who's forcing you to watch?
Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:37 pm
by Hunter Morrow
I like the game other than that. I typically mute a game when one announcer loves a player so much that his commentary will be how much he loves that player.
I was only jokin'.
Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:40 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Hunter Morrow wrote:I like the game other than that. I typically mute a game when one announcer loves a player so much that his commentary will be how much he loves that player.
I was only jokin'.
I think they have called a good game.. There is the normal GB bias, but overall not too overly mushy.
Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:44 pm
by Hunter Morrow
Packers also totally got screwed on a call of a fumble on a kick return right?
Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:57 pm
by hibbingviking
excellent game
ignore the records but every NFC team is competitive. half the AFC teams are awful.

Re: Packers = Saints
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:00 pm
by Mothman
GBFavreFan wrote:Was I right or was I right?
I think it's still too early to say but it depends on what you're talking about. I never bought the dynasty talk in the first place and I agree that their defense is questionable. I believed that going into the season. However, their best receiver (and Rodgers' favorite target) has been missing or hobbled all season and they opened against 3 of the league's current top 5 defenses (SF, Chicago and Seattle) so I think those factors have influenced their performance on offense. They have some problems, that's for sure, but with the talent they have, I think it's too early to completely rule them out as a contender. They definitely shouldn't be a
favorite anymore and their offense isn't what it was a year or two ago but as much as I'd like to, I can't write them off after 5 games, especially when they should really be sitting at 3-2, not 2-3. They're 1-0 against the division, which helps them, but they're 2-2 in the conference, which could hurt them.
Hopefully, the Bears and Vikes will compete for the division (and the Vikes will win it) while GB and Detroit continue to struggle!
Jim